AI Rate Professor

English

Anise Stevens

ENG21 · ENG060 · ENGLISH100 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want structured writing practice with and can keep up with deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful writing coachOrganized and strictFair workloadRevision opportunitiesDeadline focused
  • Students praise her for improving writing through comments, organization, and approachability.
  • The class is manageable, but , and .
  • , but feedback and revision chances improve fairness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Good grades are achievable by , and following formatting rules.

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The writing work is usually described as basic or easy, though deadlines and .

All evidence is In person, with no Online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

One review says to show up every day, but reviews do not prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Students recommend her because , and improves writing skills.

Recommendation evidence is entirely from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

She can be a , but revisions, comments, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Homework and essays are regular but usually described as easy or manageable.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students say , and effective at improving writing.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades , and written assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Assessment evidence is entirely from In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews describe a and assigns manageable but regular work.

Main concern

Strict deadlines and fall behind.

What students said

“ .”
ENG21
“ ”
ENG060
“she gives h/w everynight & its due the next day.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an format.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews focus on essays, homework, revisions, and MLA format, with .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I improved a lot in my writings because of her comments in my papers.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“I improved a lot in my writings because of her comments in my papers.”

⚖️

62/100

“ ”

📚 Workload

58/100

“she gives h/w everynight & its due the next day.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Stevens really helped me to .
  • She is easy to get along with
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Just show up everyday and do all your work and you'll pass the class.
  • she allows you to resubmit a revised and improved .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • and interesting.
  • there are essays but they are simple and .
  • she gives h/w everynight & its due the next day.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight older reviews provide consistent teaching and workload themes, but there is no current data or recommendation percentage.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1003 reviews
ENG1032 reviews
ENG0601 review
ENG211 review
ENGLISH1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values