AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jody Pritchett

MATH165 · MATH115 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
6/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you can teach yourself the course from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-teaching requiredConfusing explanationsHarsh testsUnhelpful with questionsAvoid strongly
  • Students repeatedly say they had to learn the material on their own.
  • and little useful question support.
  • One review reports a first test where nearly the whole class failed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

An A appears very hard because students report self-teaching, unreasonable support, and a .

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The ideas may be simple, but the and difficult to learn.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state an .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Students strongly warn others away because the class requires self-teaching and offers poor support.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

A review reports that 98% of students failed the .

Format shift

, and the evidence is strongly negative.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload burden is high because students say they must learn the course independently from the book.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and the workload issue is self-teaching rather than many listed assignments.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students consistently describe confusing explanations, poor communication, and weak question support.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and all three are strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

The clearest assessment evidence is a severe first test, while .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessment, with evidence centered on testing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

questions, and very harsh testing.

Main concern

while facing difficult or unfair assessments.

What students said

“Everything I've learned in this class, I've learned on my own.”
MATH115
“FIRST TEST-98% OF THE STUDENTS GOT AN F.”
MATH165

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Very harsh first testReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

Strict

15/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove proctoring or book-use policy.

Very harsh first testReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy
“FIRST TEST-98% OF THE STUDENTS GOT AN F.”
MATH165

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Everything I've learned in this class, I've learned on my own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“Everything she says only complicates and confuses pretty simple ideas”

📉 Grade Risk

5/100

“FIRST TEST-98% OF THE STUDENTS GOT AN F.”

👍 Recommendation Level

3/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Everything I've learned in this class, I've learned on my own.
  • she does not know how to convey herself well at all
  • DOESNT GO OVER MATERIAL WELL

Theme 2

❓ About Helpfulness

  • she is completely unreasonable and won't answer your questions.
  • DOESNT ANSWER QUESTIONS (ONLY AFTER CLASS)

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • FIRST TEST-98% OF THE STUDENTS GOT AN F.
  • you pretty much have to learn on your own from the book

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three old reviews are limited in number but highly consistent and detailed about the same teaching problems.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1652 reviews
MATH1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values