Jill Murphy

ENG100 · ENG101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 30/100
RMP rating: 3.0/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 2.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable teaching yourself and accepting weak instructional support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor TeachingBoring ClassNot RecommendedLow Evidence

One detailed review is strongly negative about teaching and engagement.
The only positive , so it carries limited weight.
All .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

There is not enough grade evidence, and the one detailed review describes .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove how easy it is to earn an A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course seems difficult mainly because of poor instruction rather than clearly hard English content.

Only in-person evidence exists, with one detailed negative review and one empty positive review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

The only detailed student comment because she is boring and does not teach.

Only in-person evidence exists, and the detailed review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

, so grading leniency cannot be confirmed.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews do not describe homework, essays, reading load, or workload intensity.

Format shift

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

The only detailed review says she does not teach and creates a boring class experience.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, with one strong negative comment and one no-comment positive rating.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment structure is not described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

because the only detailed comment says she does not teach and makes class boring.

Main concern

The main concern is lack of teaching and low engagement.

What students said

“Does not teach anything.”
ENG100

“Really boring she asks to many questions.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Does not teach anything.”
Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Does not teach anything.”

👍 Recommendation Level

25/100

“ .”

⚠️ Class Experience

35/100

“Really boring she asks to many questions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Does not teach anything.
You run the class.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Student Experience

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews exist, and one has no written comment, so confidence is limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 50

1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1001 review

ENG1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values