AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Dianna Carrillo

Courses not reported · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and writing, and prefer the in-person version when possible.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy reading and writingSlow gradingPoor online communicationCaring in personGE workload mismatch
  • Online reviews are strongly negative because students , and poor communication.
  • In-person reviews are more positive, describing her as caring and .
  • The course can be passable with effort, but it is not a light GE option.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, especially in person, but students repeatedly say it requires keeping up with a and writing load.

Online evidence shows , while as more doable.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The subject matter is not described as highly complex, but the course feels harder because , and reading-heavy.

Online students emphasize tedious workload, while interesting and manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation appears useful in some sections.

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

because , and weak communication outweigh the positive comments about caring teaching.

Online reviews are mostly avoidant, while and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students report late or missing grades and , though several in-person students still earned A grades with effort.

Format shift

Online grading complaints .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Nearly every review mentions too much reading, writing, homework, or tedious work for a GE course.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, but online reviews describe it as more frustrating and unnecessary.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

She is often described as caring, but online communication and .

Format shift

, while online teaching is criticized for poor communication and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and writing more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats appear assignment-heavy, with online students complaining most about volume.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, but several describe her as , and easier to pass with effort.

Main concern

The general education class.

What students said

“She was a .”
23229
“She does assign a lot of readings but if .”
24437
“She is very flexible and easy to talk to.”
24437

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students mostly report excessive , and weak communication.

Main concern

Students may not know their real grade because feedback and .

What students said

“She doesn't grade and when she does it is so late that you can be failing without knowing.”
24437
“ .”
24437
“Assigns a heavy workload each week and all these assignments are completely unnecessary to learn the material.”
24437

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews provide little clear exam-policy evidence, except one in-person review mentioning a and and test are easy.

Final PaperEasy Test MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and easy tests, but does not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

Final PaperEasy Test Mentioned
“The ”
23229
“A lot of reading but the homework and .”
24437

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She doesn't grade and when she does it is so late that you can be failing without knowing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“there is way too much work. ALOT of reading and writing didn't know I was taking an english class.”

📉 Teaching Experience

35/100

“She leaves to much work back to back and .”

❤️ In-Person Support

60/100

“Professor Carrillo is a wonderful and caring professor.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • . There's an overwhelming amount of reading and writing at times it felt like I was taking an English class with all the essays assigned.
  • She gives lots of .
  • No one has the time to read 300 pages.

Theme 2

💬 About Communication

  • .
  • so long as well.
  • She didn't have a so it was hard to ask her anything.

Theme 3

❤️

  • She truly wants to see her students succeed.
  • Her classes are fun and interesting as well!
  • She will do everything she can to help you pass the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen recent reviews across both formats show consistent workload concerns and a .

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

244379 reviews
232295 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 3 · A 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1