AI Rate Professor

History

Vincent Romo

HIS112 · HIST170C · HIST125C · HIST171C · HIST275C · HIST112 · HIST275 · 110B · HIST170 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want discussion-heavy history and , and inconsistent support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing lecturerHeavy readingTricky quizzesSarcastic responsesBetter in person
  • Students are and frustrating online course design.
  • Grades can be high, but , and .
  • Many complaints focus on sarcastic or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students earn A grades, but , and as real costs.

Online evidence shows more quiz frustration, while and hard grading complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The history content is not usually described as conceptually impossible, but and detailed prompts make it demanding.

Online courses feel more tedious because of videos, readings, and quizzes, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not consistently prove a , though participation and showing up matter in many in-person classes.

Online evidence centers on deadlines and weekly work, while and discussion.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Recommendations are split because some students love his passion and humor while and grading.

, where complaints about communication and quiz design are stronger.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

High grades appear possible, but many students report and tricky quizzes.

Format shift

Online reviews mention strict deadlines and confusing tests, while .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students repeatedly mention heavy , and papers.

Format shift

Online workload is described as especially reading-heavy, while in-person workload varies by course but still often requires preparation.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He can be engaging and knowledgeable, but repeated complaints about sarcasm, vague answers, and course design lower the experience.

Format shift

In-person teaching is often praised as lively, while online teaching receives more criticism for being hands-off and unclear.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment appears to combine quizzes or , and writing assignments.

Format shift

Online sections lean more toward weekly quizzes and discussions, while , and occasional exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are more mixed, with and knowledge while and sarcasm.

Main concern

The in-person experience depends heavily on whether students like his discussion style and and grading.

What students said

“In person it's basically a historic conversation.”
HIST170C
“Horrible professor the way he grades makes no sense what so ever.”
HIST275
“ and the class was overall very fun.”
HIS112

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly , and slow or sarcastic communication.

Main concern

Online students often feel and assignments with limited useful help.

What students said

“The and he will never properly answer any of your questions and is quite rude.”
HIST112
“u only get graded on weekly tests which were kinda difficult for me.”
HIST275C
“Work for ur grade, then this will be an easy A class.”
HIST170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show quiz-heavy assessment with some open-note online tests but also tricky wording and occasional timed or unpredictable tests.

Tricky QuizzesWeekly TestsOnline Open Note EvidenceTimed Tests OnlineUnpredictable Tests

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in one class, and unpredictable tests in another, so the policy varies.

Timed Tests OnlineSimple QuizzesUnpredictable Tests
“ ”
HIST112
“ though you go based off the passages he provides.”
HIST275

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes or tests, with one review clearly saying tests could be taken while .

Weekly QuizzesOpen Note Book EvidenceTricky QuestionsStrict Deadlines
“the while reading the material(open note/book)”
HIST275C
“There were a few errors with quizzes and a few difficult/tricky questions.”
HIST112

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not sure what these other comments are about because this professor was by far THE .”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“He's an awesome professor. Eye opening discussions I suggest if because he will challenge your beliefs and ideas.”

⚖️

35/100

“Horrible professor the way he grades makes no sense what so ever.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“You have and as well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • In person it's basically a historic conversation.
  • He has interesting topics that he covers and if you approach him he will be happy to help you learn.
  • He won't give you a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Struggled so much to pass the class with an A.
  • Work for ur grade, then this will be an easy A class.
  • .

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • He'll answer you sarcastically and .
  • and willing to help.
  • and dry respons

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The 35 reviews span many years and formats with , and teaching style.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 514

Course coverage

HIST170C9 reviews
HIST1126 reviews
HIST1705 reviews
HIST171C4 reviews
HIST275C4 reviews
Show 4 more courses
HIST2753 reviews
HIST125C2 reviews
110B1 review
HIS1121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 3 · A 12 · A- 2

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 7

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 2