AI Rate Professor

Communication

Susan Virzi

COMM100C · COMM100 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
23.53%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

unless you only need a basic communication class and and uncomfortable lectures.

Best fit · Easy A HunterTough graderUnclear expectationsPassive aggressive tonePersonal rantsEasy coursework
  • Students often say the class work itself is easy, but the professor experience is highly negative.
  • The most repeated complaints are unclear grading, personal political or religious commentary, and passive-aggressive behavior.
  • A few students found her caring and straightforward, but the negative reviews dominate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

The coursework is often easy and several students earned high grades, but unclear and A.

In-person reviews more clearly describe easy work, while online .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The communication content and assignments sound basic, but and it should.

Both formats suggest the material is not intellectually hard, but online reviews provide less detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Participation and , and students report being called out or criticized for missing class or arriving late.

In-person reviews give the clearest attendance evidence, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

23/100

Most students do not recommend her because of , and a disrespectful or passive-aggressive classroom tone.

Both online and even more uniformly critical.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly say she deducts points unpredictably and .

Format shift

Both formats report tough grading, with .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The actual work is usually described as easy or manageable, though some reviews mention lots of homework and group projects.

Format shift

, while online reviews focus more on lectures and grading.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

The dominant pattern is unfocused , and hostile interactions, despite a few positive reviews.

Format shift

In-person and online reviews both criticize teaching style, but online reviews are more consistently negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and participation rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

In-person reviews identify speeches, rubrics, and group work, while online reviews do not clearly detail assessment mix.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews describe easy classwork but frequent frustration with , and .

Main concern

The main risk is the classroom experience and .

What students said

“The actual class work is fairly easy and straightforward but, be ready to hear her political opinions.”
COMM100C
“ and she never lets you know her expectations.”
COMM100

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, emphasizing disrespectful tone, unclear grading, long unfocused lectures, and .

Main concern

Online students reported little clarity and .

What students said

“Her grading is absurd and will mark you down for things she did not clarify, .”
COMM100
“ .”
COMM100C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam format, and the .

Unclear exam evidenceParticipation and speechesPicky gradingNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and graded class work but do not clearly prove the format of .

Exams mentionedSpeeches and assignmentsUnclear exam format
“She even adds points for .”
COMM100C
“Her rubrics for .”
COMM100C

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

No clear proctoring evidenceNo clear exam format evidence

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you're able. She is all over the place.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Her lectures were long and she was all over the place.”

⚖️

18/100

“ and she never lets you know her expectations.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

23/100

“ if you don't have to.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She overly explained the same things every single class.
  • She constantly brings up her own views about religion/politics.
  • Her lectures were long and she was all over the place.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The actual class work is fairly easy and straightforward.
  • She'll mark you down for anything SHE deems to be wrong.
  • and is pretty picky when it comes to your presentation outline.

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Tone

  • She will make little passive aggressive remarks toward other students and .
  • She screamed at us once and made us uncomfortable.
  • and would try to relate and express stories during her lectures.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across several years show a consistent negative pattern, though a small set of positive reviews creates some variation.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 510

Course coverage

COMM100C13 reviews
COMM1004 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1