AI Rate Professor

Human Services

Virgil Adams

HUSR270 · SOCIOLOGY · HUSR292 · HUSR224 · HURS224 · HUSC290 · HUSR200 · HUSR291 · SOC101 · HUSR294 · HUSR240 · SOC292 · ALL · HUSR · DRUGSANDALCOH · HURS241 · HUSR295 · SOCIO101 · HURS292 · HUSR240C · 152 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
25.58%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him only if you , and a professor many students find disrespectful.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCondescending toneTest heavyMandatory participationPoor communicationReading required
  • Many students describe him as , and hard to contact.
  • , and in-class participation.
  • Some students praise his knowledge and structure, but the negative tone is strong and consistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and surviving exam-heavy grading.

Online evidence shows more confusion and , while if students follow strict class rules.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

Students often say the material itself is not hard, but the course feels harder because of , and strict participation.

Online reviews blame disorganization and Canvas issues more, while in-person reviews focus on being called on and following rules.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

as required, with many reviews warning that skipping class or disengaging can hurt the grade.

, but in-person comments more often mention being called on, kicked out, or marked absent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most recent comments advise avoiding him because of rude behavior, weak communication, and .

Online recommendations are especially poor, while in-person reviews include a small group of strong supporters.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Several students earn high grades, but , and exams that can dominate the course.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tough grading and few graded items more often, while and notes are strong.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The , and participation rather than many small assignments.

Format shift

Online students report more reading and , while , and class behavior.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

His subject knowledge is acknowledged, but repeated complaints about rudeness, disorganization, and refusing questions sharply lower the teaching score.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize weak communication and Zoom issues, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

83/100

Reviews repeatedly say grades , and a few graded items.

Format shift

Both formats are exam-heavy, with and timed quizzes more often.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but still risky, with strong praise from some students and repeated , and being called on.

Main concern

Students who dislike being put on the spot may struggle with his in-person style.

What students said

“By far the most disrespectful professor Ive ever had.”
SOCIO101
“Easy A if you follow these instructions.”
HUSR295
“ , sometimes word for word, so .”
ALL

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing unclear Canvas use, poor email , and rude interactions.

Main concern

Online students often report poor communication and .

What students said

“Professor Adams lacks communication and .”
HUSR200
“He will NOT answer any questions about anything related to the class, and and .”
HUSC290
“It felt like he was just rambling over zoom for 3 hours straight and nothing he said was on the test.”
HURS224

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam style appears risky because grades often depend heavily on exams and access.

Timed QuizzesExam HeavyFew Graded ItemsUnclear Exam Access

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove closed-book, proctoring, or open-book policies.

Exam HeavyNo Make-Up ExamsLecture-Based Exams
“ , sometimes word for word, so .”
ALL
“there are .”
HUSR240
“make sure you attend to class and because its based on your grade!!”
HURS224

Online

Online reviews clearly , and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Timed QuizzesLocked Canvas ExamExam Heavy
“The , and .”
HUSR240
“there's an , while and you aren't able to access.”
HUSR200
“We .”
SOC292

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you ...even if you have to transfer to another school.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom climate. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“He knows the material yes, but it is another skill to know how to teach to a group of 18/19 year-olds, which he does not.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

28/100

“ .”

🧪

83/100

“Most of your grade comes from 4 exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Arrogant, condescending, and passive aggressive.
  • Professor Adams was the first human service professor I took any classes from when I first started.
  • Amazing instructor. I learned a lot in his classes and he inspired me to participate in my own education.

Theme 2

📚

  • ALOT of .
  • We .
  • You will NOT pass if you don't read the material.

Theme 3

🧍 About Classroom Climate

  • He likes to call on students who look lost and then he'll belittle you.
  • Loves to make people feel dumb.
  • During class participation is very important!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

152

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 reviews across many years and both formats, with consistent , and polarizing behavior.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 522
3 out of 529
2 out of 523
1 out of 527

Course coverage

HUSR24010 reviews
HURS2247 reviews
HUSR2004 reviews
DRUGSANDALCOH3 reviews
HUSC2903 reviews
Show 15 more courses
SOC1013 reviews
HURS2412 reviews
HUSR2242 reviews
HUSR2702 reviews
HUSR2952 reviews
SOC2922 reviews
SOCIOLOGY2 reviews
ALL1 review
HURS2921 review
HUSR1 review
HUSR240C1 review
HUSR2911 review
HUSR2921 review
HUSR2941 review
SOCIO1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 1 · A 16 · A- 3

B range

10

B+ 3 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 1