AI Rate Professor

Communication

Kenneth Carrell

COMM100C · COMM100 · COM10121 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
15.79%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

unless , and delayed feedback.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderLate gradingEngaging lecturesStrict deadlinesPoor email response
  • Students repeatedly say he grades speeches and assignments far harder than an intro communication course requires.
  • Many , and severe late-work penalties.
  • Lectures are often described as funny or engaging, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A appears very hard because students describe aggressive grading, unforgiving late penalties, and .

Both online and in-person reviews describe a hard A, with and late-work penalties.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course content is introductory, but , and strict expectations make it feel harder than the course level suggests.

Online and in-person students both say the intro course feels more demanding than expected.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Attendance and participation appear strict, with multiple reviews saying you will not pass if .

Both formats include participation pressure, while and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and feedback often comes too late.

Online reviews are negative but mixed, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students repeatedly call him a tough or and grades speeches strictly.

Format shift

Both formats report harsh grading, with late penalties.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

The workload is not just volume-based; students say , and deadlines require constant attention.

Format shift

Online reviews mention reading and homework, while , and recovery difficulty.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

He can be funny and engaging in class, but , and unclear standards severely hurt the experience.

Format shift

Both formats mention teaching strengths, but while criticizing course management.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades , and a small number of exams rather than only tests.

Format shift

Online reviews mention speeches, a midterm, and a final, while , and two exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews praise his personality and lectures but , and slow grade updates.

Main concern

Late or to recover or .

What students said

“ .”
COMM100
“If you want an easy .”
COMM100C

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students also describe him as a strong teacher but an extremely tough and .

Main concern

students felt were unclear.

What students said

“ if you are looking to get an easy A.”
COMM100
“I still got beat up in the grading.”
COMM100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and speech assessments, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, or proctoring requirements.

Two ExamsMidtermFinalSpeech Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or .

Two ExamsDifficult Exams
“There are 2 exams, both will mess up your grade so you HAVE to study.”
COMM100C
“He gives 2 tests per semester, however they're VERY difficult.”
COM10121

Online

Online reviews mention one midterm and one final as easy in one review, but they .

MidtermFinal
“1 mid-term (Easy), and a .”
COMM100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you are looking to get an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“He is a pleasant guy in person&lectures are entertaining.”

⚖️

8/100

“He grades incredibly aggressive for an entry level communications class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Too strict for late work (50% off straight awy).
  • I still got beat up in the grading.
  • life

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is funny and engaging during his lectures.
  • The Prof. himself though seems like a funny guy, his lectures were entertaining and he seemed pretty friendly.
  • Funny and straight forward guy.

Theme 3

🚫 About Course Risk

  • .
  • If you want an easy .
  • Harder to recover your grade in this class vs any other.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The 19 reviews span many years, include detailed examples, and as the central issue.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 58
1 out of 54

Course coverage

COMM10013 reviews
COMM100C4 reviews
COM101212 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 6

C range

7

C+ 2 · C 3 · C- 2

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1