AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Lenore Landis

CHEM107 · CHEM111 · CHEM111A · CHEM111B · CHEM201 · CHEM101 · CHEM111BC · 107C · 67 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take Landis if you want a and attendance.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Chemistry ExplanationsCaring and HelpfulExtra Credit AvailableAttendance MattersPractice-Based Exams
  • Students consistently say Landis and many examples.
  • Grades are very attainable with , and studying, but the class is not effortless.
  • The main risk is falling behind, because , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is very realistic with , and studying, helped by and fair exams, but it is not a free A.

The Easy A evidence is almost entirely from in-person reviews, while the one .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students and approachable, though chemistry content, exams, and .

In-person reviews repeatedly describe clear pacing and examples, while the single online .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as important or required, especially because lectures, labs, notes, and participation affect success.

In-person reviews strongly support strict attendance importance, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because she teaches clearly, cares about students, and gives practical help to succeed.

Recommendation strength comes mainly from in-person reviews, with the one online review also positive but limited.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Grades are fair and helped , and clear expectations.

Format shift

and fair grading, while online grading evidence is minimal.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, and studying, but most students say the work is useful and manageable.

Format shift

and homework, while the single online review does not establish workload level.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently praise , and ability to make chemistry understandable.

Format shift

In-person reviews give extensive teaching evidence, and the online review .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment appears , and a cumulative final in some courses.

Format shift

, and practicum, while online review evidence is too thin to compare.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly , and fair preparation for exams.

Main concern

Students warn that missing class or .

What students said

“She made complex concepts easy to understand and would clarify what needed clarifying.”
CHEM107
“DO NOT MISS DAYS. If you miss even one day it will become very very hard.”
CHEM107

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online and answers questions kindly.

Main concern

Only , so online-specific confidence is limited.

What students said

“Professor Landis is very nice and .”
CHEM107

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams can be difficult but are usually predictable from notes, practice, SI worksheets, and class examples, with one review noting a note card for the final.

Practice-Based ExamsCumulative FinalLab PracticumNote Card for FinalExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

final, practice-based preparation, and one note-card final policy.

Practice-Based ExamsCumulative FinalLab PracticumNote Card for Final
“ SI so you know what to expect.”
CHEM107
“There were 4 exams (100 pts ea), 1 cumulative final (200 pts), and a lab practicum (50 pts).”
CHEM107
“Labs and practicum are easy and lets you use a note card for final.”
CHEM107

Online

The online review does not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly one of the . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“She made complex concepts easy to understand and would clarify what needed clarifying.”

👍 Recommendation Level

96/100

“ .”

⚖️ Effort and Grades

84/100

“Easy A if you work hard!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very good at teaching and makes everything understandable.
  • She goes through the problems as many times as you need until it sticks.
  • She made chemistry so easy and fun for me with her amazing lecture skills.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You will have to work for your grade.
  • Show up, do the homework and you will pass.
  • but its just the material.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She genuinely cares for her students and wants them to succeed.
  • She is willing to do anything to help her students do well.
  • if you need help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

67

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years show a highly consistent pattern of strong teaching, fair grades, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 548
4 out of 512
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM10726 reviews
CHEM111B7 reviews
CHEM1114 reviews
CHEM1013 reviews
CHEM111A3 reviews
Show 3 more courses
CHEM2013 reviews
107C2 reviews
CHEM111BC2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 2 · A 21 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3