AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Hilary Reuter

PSY23500 · PSY101 · PSY202 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if , and a professor whose structure works well for some students but poorly for others.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing ExperienceHeavy ReadingStrict ExamsDisorganized for SomeChallenging but Doable
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who find her caring and challenging and students who feel lost or unsupported.
  • Grades are possible with , and consistent effort, but it is not an easy A.
  • Online reviews raise the because several mention proctored or monitored testing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A grades are possible, but comments repeatedly stress heavy reading, studying, strict deadlines, and hard course material.

Online reviews add proctored tests and self-teaching concerns, while , and grading expectations.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content is often described as difficult, memorization-heavy, fast-paced, and complex, especially in Brain and Behavior and Research Methods.

Both formats describe challenging content, with online and in-person courses adding demanding lectures and projects.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some reviews mention pushed-back dates and flexible workload, while others say late work and personal circumstances receive little consideration.

and , while online evidence emphasizes strict submission deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendation depends on student style because some praise her care and rigor while others strongly warn against taking her.

Both formats are polarized, but online reviews contain more severe self-teaching and proctoring complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students often mention tough grading, no late credit, high expectations, and needing strong work to earn good grades.

Format shift

Online reviews stress strict deadlines and proctored tests, while and demanding projects.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Workload is heavy because reviews mention lots of , and time-consuming Cengage work.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize reading, Cengage, and weekly pace, while , and complex material.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is polarized, with some students calling her caring and knowledgeable while others describe disorganization, confusion, and poor support.

Format shift

Online reviews are more likely to mention self-teaching and module disorganization, while and unclear structure.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tests, quizzes, study guides, proctored exams, and .

Format shift

Online reviews clearly mention proctored exams and quizzes, while , and few grading items.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are also polarized, with strong praise for care and knowledge but , and compassion.

Main concern

and study heavily because the courses are tough and .

What students said

“Its challenging but doable if you put in the work.”
PSY23500
“This professor made it hard to understand the class.”
PSY101

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some calling the class straightforward and , and disorganization.

Main concern

Online students report proctored or , and inconsistent support.

What students said

“ and monitored.”
PSY202
“This professor makes you teach yourself.”
PSY23500

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Overall exam risk is strict because online reviews explicitly mention monitored, Proctorio, and proctored tests, while details.

Lockdown TestingMonitored ExamsProctorioProctored TestsStudy Guides

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and useful study guides, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, webcam, proctoring, or .

Difficult TestsStudy GuidesTest Heavy
“Make sure to study and fill out the study guide (helped me a lot).”
PSY202
“ , and I mean good notes; they'll help you in the test.”
PSY23500
“The classes themselves are tough.”
PSY202

Online

Online reviews explicitly describe lockdown, monitored, Proctorio, and proctored tests, though .

Lockdown TestingMonitored ExamsProctorioProctored Tests
“ and monitored.”
PSY202
“ you.”
PSY101
“She uses Proctorio, which monitors you while .”
PSY101
“ .”
PSY23500

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Its challenging but doable if you put in the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Dr. , and professional, and she has such a positive attitude in class.”

⚖️ Recommendation Split

52/100

“Really not that bad of a prof like people make her out to be the class is just difficult.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“ , and covering three chapters in one week and then having a quiz.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She genuinely cares about her students and wants us all to succeed.
  • and .
  • This professor makes you teach yourself.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You need to work hard in this class to get a good grade.
  • The class itself is challenging because of the memorization.
  • Just do what is expected of you and you will pass the class.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams and Structure

  • and monitored.
  • The bulk of hw is from Cengage and .
  • BUT U NEVER KNOW !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews across formats and years provide detailed, consistent evidence of a highly polarized but workload-heavy experience.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PSY2350010 reviews
PSY2026 reviews
PSY1015 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 3