AI Rate Professor

English

Corey Leis

801B · ENGL103 · ENG60 · ENGL100 · ENG100 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
95.45%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with reading and essays.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring writing coachDetailed feedbackMany essaysFlexible revision gradingHighly recommended
  • Students , and ability to improve writing.
  • The class , and serious participation.
  • because revision opportunities and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very reachable if students complete the , and revise when offered.

Both formats reward steady effort, while in-person comments give stronger evidence of revision-based grade recovery.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The writing concepts are manageable, but the , and repeated essays.

Online and but not effortless course content.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Participation matters often, but only the online COVID review clearly says attendance was technically not required.

, while in-person evidence emphasizes participation without proving a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because , and helps them become better writers.

Both online and in-person reviews supporting the pattern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

but forgiving because students mention flexible scales, detailed criteria, and chances to revise for higher grades.

Format shift

, while online reviews support clear criteria and helpful feedback.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

The workload is heavy for English because students repeatedly mention lots of , and discussion boards.

Format shift

Both formats include reading and writing, with .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe him as , and unusually effective at improving writing.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both praise his support, with and stronger record.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment , and a portfolio rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and support, with repeated warnings about essays and reading.

Main concern

The workload can feel heavy because papers, reading, and .

What students said

“TAKE HIS CLASS! but he is not a hard critique!”
ENG100
“The only bad thing is there is a lot of work but it will pay off in the end and class discussions.”
ENGL100
“We had 2 major essays graded through the 1-4 scale.”
ENGL103

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe him as , and .

Main concern

Weekly reading, discussion work, and .

What students said

“So helpful and ”
ENGL103
“ , but good active participation in class (completing all activities, disc boards, readings) is still expected.”
ENGL100
“You do a lot of reading and answer questions each week.”
ENGL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a specific exam format, .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Reviews do not clearly prove in-person exam policy

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“TAKE HIS CLASS! but he is not a hard critique! He helps you find ways to expand your way of thinking.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“One of the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ if you need English credit even if you think you aren't good at writing.”

⚖️

82/100

“he offers a redemption for higher grade”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Loves what he does and is good at it.
  • He made English a fun class.
  • So helpful and

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • He assigns lots of essays, but if you put in the effort it is doable.
  • Be prepared to write A LOT
  • You do a lot of reading and answer questions each week.

Theme 3

📝 And Grades

  • he gives very specific and .
  • .
  • Love his grading scale and gives you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 22 reviews span many years and , and care.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL1009 reviews
ENG1008 reviews
ENGL1033 reviews
801B1 review
ENG601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 2 · A 9

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Rather not say 2