AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Myev Rees

PHIL100 · PHIL105C · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take her if you like discussion-heavy philosophy and can keep up with reading, but if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerEngaging LecturesReading HeavyParticipation RequiredMixed Online ExamsCaring but Firm
  • Students often praise her passion, kindness, and and religion clearly.
  • The workload , and participation.
  • Online PHIL105C reviews are sharply mixed because some students and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic with , and participation, but missed exams or poor exam fit can seriously hurt grades.

Online evidence is mixed between easy assignments and stressful oral exams, while and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Standard

51/100

The concepts are accessible when explained well, but the and .

, while online students more often mention heavy lectures and many concepts.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

In-person reviews describe participation, , and .

The strongest attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, while online reviews focus , and Zoom exams.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Students recommend her for engaging teaching and fairness, but hesitation comes from workload, communication issues, and .

, while online reviews are polarized by course structure and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Many students call grading fair or easy, but and .

Format shift

Online grading is more polarizing, while if students read, attend, and .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

The workload , and video responses.

Format shift

Online courses can feel heavier because of lecture videos, weekly quizzes, discussion boards, and video responses; and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Good

75/100

Most students praise her passion, kindness, lectures, and explanations, but several online students report poor support or stressful communication.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are steadier and warmer, while online reviews range from excellent to frustrating.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment combines reading quizzes, discussions, participation, videos, assignments, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention oral midterms or finals and weekly work, while and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive but , and frequent or pop quizzes.

Main concern

Attendance and participation matter because she may call on students and .

What students said

“ .”
PHIL100
“ so .”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews and stressful courses with and heavy lecture material.

Main concern

Some online students felt surprised and .

What students said

“ .”
PHIL105C
“ .”
PHIL105C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style varies, but online oral exams and .

One-on-One Zoom ExamsOral ExamReading QuizzesPop QuizzesStudy Guide Mismatch

Assessment risk

Varies

37/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention reading-based quizzes, notes allowed on quizzes, and pop quizzes, but .

Reading QuizzesPop QuizzesNotes Allowed On Quizzes
“ .”
PHIL100
“ but usually doesn't tell you when they are”
PHIL100

Online

Online reviews , but do not clearly prove webcam rules beyond the Zoom meeting itself.

One-on-One Zoom ExamsOral ExamStudy Guide Mismatch
“the ”
PHIL105C
“There is a .”
PHIL100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Definitely not an easy class but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

75/100

“She is extremely good at being professional with difficult topics of religion and culture and can understand without reducing meaning.”

📚 Workload Reality

42/100

“This class definitely has a bit of reading and a lot of concepts to learn.”

⚠️

37/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Rees is very sweet and welcoming!
  • She is a passionate teacher and the !
  • Her lectures were engaging and she encourages us to share our opinions on what we're learning.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There is quite a bit of reading and there is a .
  • 2 weekly quizzes and 1 discussion board about your thoughts about a matter or chapter.
  • This class is fair amount of work nothing no one's incapable of

Theme 3

🧪

  • .
  • There is a .
  • but usually doesn't tell you when they are

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen recent reviews provide useful detail, but the online section is polarized and some reviews have uncertain recommendation values.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL1009 reviews
PHIL105C9 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 5 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1