AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Deryl Jackson

AJ140 · AJ120 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
30.77%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Avoid unless , and learning much of the material on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear instructionsInconsistent gradingPersonal storiesLong assignmentsLow learning value
  • Many students say lectures drift into LAPD stories instead of course content.
  • Grading and instructions are often described as .
  • Older reviews describe the class as easy, but recent reviews are much more negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students earned A grades and older reviews call the class easy, but recent comments , and harsh deductions.

Online evidence shows A grades with , while in-person evidence ranges from very easy older AJ140 reviews to recent tougher AJ120 complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The course content itself is often described as easy or basic, but should.

Online , while in-person reviews more clearly say the material can be easy but poorly taught.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation appears to matter in some in-person sections.

Online , while some in-person tags mention participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

27/100

Most recent students warn against taking him because , and not helpful.

Online reviews are mixed but mostly concerned about grading, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Recent , and point deductions that feel unfair.

Format shift

Online reviews directly cite inconsistent deductions, while , and tough-grader tags.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students mention , and writing-heavy exams.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews more often describe long assignments and papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students often say he is animated or funny, but many also , and teaches little course content.

Format shift

Online reviews split between experienced and harsh, while quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear to , and a smaller number of .

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework and tests, while , and writing-heavy exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and limited learning.

Main concern

Students say he talks about his career more than teaching the course.

What students said

“Honestly, I have not learned anything in this class as well as he doesn't talk much about the course more about his LAPD experience.”
AJ120
“ .”
AJ120

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but lean negative because students cite harsh tone and .

Main concern

Students report harsh expectations and inconsistent deductions.

What students said

“His grading system is inconsistent and .”
AJ120
“Good professor, has a lot of experience.”
AJ120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

or easy tests and others describing writing-heavy or test-heavy sections.

Few ExamsWriting-Heavy ExamsEasy ICS ChartsScantron TestsProjects

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and easy ICS charts, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Few ExamsWriting-Heavy ExamsEasy ICS ChartsScantron Tests
“ but require a ton of writing.”
AJ120
“All you had to do was just take 2 scan tron tests and 2 projects.”
AJ140

Online

Online reviews only say tests are not the hardest and do not clearly prove .

Tests Not The Hardest
“ ”
AJ120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Avoid this professor. and if you ask him a question he scrutinizes you, very awful teacher DO NOT TAKE !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and treatment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“He did not explain well either or so much.”

⚖️

28/100

“His grading system is inconsistent and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

27/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He talks way too much about his own experiences and I did not learn whatsoever.
  • He talks the whole class, about his life and how he is a LAPD officer.
  • and his examples help with the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and vague.
  • and he does not check for ai.
  • It is basically do the projects and you pass. .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Treatment

  • He hates to hear "excuses" and expect students to know everything.
  • He does not work with you if something is going on.
  • if you ask him a question he scrutinizes you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across recent and older terms give consistent patterns, though the tone has become more negative recently.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

AJ12011 reviews
AJ1402 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1