AI Rate Professor

Theater

Paul Hadobas

THEA147 · THEA24299 · THEA147C · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a and are willing to participate fully.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInspirationalCaringExpert feedbackHands-on classParticipation required
  • Students describe Paul Hadobas as an exceptional, passionate, and .
  • The class is rewarding but not effortless because , and hands-on work matter.
  • Grades are generally strong, but students must show up, participate, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

High grades are common, but , and effort are required.

Online and , but both formats stress effort rather than a free A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The material is accessible with his guidance, but comfort zone.

Online reviews mention difficulty generating ideas, while and participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Participation and class presence are repeatedly described as required for success.

, while online reviews also tag participation as important.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because , and .

Both online and praise coming from in-person students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grades are high, but comments mention , and needing to work for the grade.

Format shift

Both formats show good grades, while and grading pressure.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The class , and hands-on work, with one review calling the workload heavy.

Format shift

, while online reviews only note that effort is needed.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe him as passionate, skilled, caring, inspiring, and unusually supportive.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong in both formats, with .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment appears centered , and hands-on creative work rather than exams.

Format shift

, and online reviews do not clearly mention exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are extremely enthusiastic, emphasizing expert guidance, caring support, hands-on learning, and required participation.

Main concern

Attendance and participation are essential, and some students mention a heavy workload or long class time.

What students said

“ .”
THEA147C
“He goes the extra mile for everyone, he cares about his students”
THEA147C
“The only things I didn't care for was the amount of work we had”
THEA147

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and support, while noting that students still need original ideas and effort.

Main concern

Online students may struggle with creative design ideas and still need to work for the grade.

What students said

“He creates an environment that is friendly and and criticism in a nice way.”
THEA147C
“Definitely have to work for your grade but if you're truly interested, you'll love it!”
THEA147C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , and the course appears mainly project and participation based.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyAssignment-Based Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Paul is one of the greatest professors to walk this earth.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“He goes the extra mile for everyone, he cares about his students, he's extremely knowledgeable, he's very easy to talk to, and he really helps you believe your dreams are possible.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“TAKE HIS CLASS!”

📌 Participation Requirement

15/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Paul is a and wonderful educator.
  • He had a knack for teaching things that are often hard to verbalize.
  • He's such an amazing teacher with lots of go through.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • His care, positivity, and devotion to student success and well-being, .
  • He is very sweet and really wants his students to succeed.
  • He really knows his stuff and will help in any way he possibly can!

Theme 3

📌 About Effort & Participation

  • Definitely have to work for your grade but if you're truly interested, you'll love it!
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years are detailed, consistent, and overwhelmingly positive across both formats.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

THEA147C8 reviews
THEA1472 reviews
THEA242991 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 4 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values