AI Rate Professor

Art

Mary Beierle

CRN10430 · ART151 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a and helps you improve.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorStrong feedbackEffort-based gradingEncouraging studio workBeginner supportive
  • Students consistently describe Mary Beierle as caring, helpful, and inspiring.
  • Grades appear based more on effort and improvement than raw artistic skill.
  • The work can be challenging, especially hands-on studio skills, but support is strong.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A looks very realistic if students keep trying, participate, and complete the work.

Online reviews directly mention effort-based grading and late-work flexibility, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course is approachable with guidance, but hands-on art skills can still be challenging.

Online reviews sound smoother and more flexible, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Participation matters across reviews, but only one in-person tag suggests skipping class could hurt passing.

Online Zoom lectures were described as optional, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Every review is highly positive, with , and inspiration.

Both formats are strongly recommended, with online praise focused on flexibility and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students say she grades effort and improvement rather than artistic perfection.

Format shift

Online evidence is clearest about effort-based grading, while .

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Homework and practice matter, but reviews frame the workload as useful rather than excessive.

Format shift

and repeated practice, while online reviews do not describe heavy workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe her as caring, engaging, helpful, and inspiring.

Format shift

Online students praise her optional Zoom help, while in-person students emphasize direct emotional and technical support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

and participation-based assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and major growth through practice.

Main concern

Hands-on work may feel difficult if students struggle with coordination or technique.

What students said

“HW is important if you plan on improving!”
ART151
“ , and physically.”
ART151

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students describe her as , and .

Main concern

Online evidence is positive but limited to two reviews.

What students said

“she grades you on effort, not how amazing your piece is.”
ART151
“In , and helpful as a professor regarding our art projects.”
ART151

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she grades you on effort, not how amazing your piece is.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“Mary was one of the of Design in 3 Dimensions class at Chaffey College and I thoroughly enjoyed my time in her class.”

⚖️

90/100

“she grades you on effort, not how amazing your piece is.”

❤️ Student Support

98/100

“ , and physically.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • In , and helpful as a professor regarding our art projects.
  • Profressor Beierele takes the time really help her students and she's an inspiration to have as a wonderful person!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • HW is important if you plan on improving!
  • she grades you on effort, not how amazing your piece is.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • one of so understanding & truly appreciates all art.
  • heart <3

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Six consistent reviews across several years provide strong tone but limited sample size.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART1515 reviews
CRN104301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values