AI Rate Professor

Communication

Michael Brydges

HUMCOM100 · COMM105 · 100TEACHERPRE · COMM135 · COMM120 · COM105 · COM100 · COMM100 · 91 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
18.75%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless , and a heavy communication workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedUnclear assignmentsLate gradingPaper heavyTough grader
  • The dominant complaint is disorganization, including unclear instructions, vague deadlines, and .
  • Course content is often described as not inherently hard, but his and stressful.
  • A few students find him funny or caring, but the overall recommendation signal is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students earn As, but , and tough grading make the A feel costly.

Online evidence says work is doable but vague, while and organization problems.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The communication content is often not hard, but confusing instruction and .

Both formats suggest the material itself is manageable, while added confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Participation and , and several students complain about late starts, late dismissals, and needing to show up for points.

, while online reviews do not clearly prove flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students do not recommend him because of , and stressful assignments.

Both online and reviews much more severe.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly call him a tough grader and , and .

Format shift

, while online reviews mention vague expectations and end-loaded grade uncertainty.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews describe many , and even multiple finals.

Format shift

Online reviews mention essays and group projects, while , and confusing deadlines.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Most comments describe , and late grading despite occasional praise for personality.

Format shift

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, while online reviews are less severe but still cite vagueness and .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears split across papers, , and final assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize essays and projects, while in-person , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews overwhelmingly criticize , and tough or confusing assessment.

Main concern

Unclear instructions and itself.

What students said

“Lectures are disjointed, lack structure, and fail to provide any meaningful learning value.”
COM100
“Canvas is so disorganized and confusing.”
COM105
“Grading took weeks, and .”
COMM120

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews say the work is doable but vague, paper heavy, and .

Main concern

Grades and .

What students said

“His requirements are vague, however if you ask and need help, he does answer you.”
COM105
“he will leave you clueless about your grade until the end of the semester”
COMM105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies by course, but students often describe tests and finals as .

Final ExamFinal PaperQuizzesMidtermHard TestsMultiple Choice Exam

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Final ExamFinal PaperMidtermHard TestsQuizzes
“ and a .”
COMM120
“The .”
COM100

Online

Online reviews mention easy tests and no final in one course, but proctoring rules.

Easy TestsNo Final Mentioned By One Review
“The . .”
COM105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save your GPA-find any other instructor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting , and recommendation risk; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Lectures are disjointed, lack structure, and fail to provide any meaningful learning value.”

⚖️

22/100

“ and lacks any transparency; hard work yields only demoralizing results.”

📚 Workload Load

25/100

“So .”

Theme 1

🧭 About Organization

  • Canvas is so disorganized and confusing.
  • and due dates.
  • and never once used the book.

Theme 2

📄

  • So .
  • Grades are always late with .
  • you won't know what grade .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

91

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years show a consistent pattern of , and low recommendation despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 59
3 out of 510
2 out of 527
1 out of 535

Course coverage

COMM10512 reviews
COMM10011 reviews
COM1058 reviews
COM1007 reviews
COMM1205 reviews
Show 4 more courses
COMM1354 reviews
100TEACHERPRE1 review
101331 review
HUMCOM1001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 6 · A- 1

B range

11

B 11

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

11

Not sure yet 7 · Rather not say 3 · Rather_Not_Say 1