AI Rate Professor

Art History

Regina Herod

Courses not reported · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderMandatory participationLecture heavyPoor communicationRigid expectations
  • , and low flexibility.
  • Several students say instructions, Canvas communication, and .
  • A few students earned A grades by attending, following instructions, and building assignment buffers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A is possible, but students repeatedly say it requires strict attendance, participation, following her exact preferences, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The art content itself can be manageable, but , and a challenging final raise the difficulty.

Only in-person reviews exist, so the course challenge reflects classroom delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly described as required and grade-affecting.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students warn against taking the class because of , and rigid classroom control.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Many students call her a and say grades depend on exact compliance with her expectations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is described as manageable in volume but stressful because , and exams carry strict expectations.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most comments , and a classroom tone that students found discouraging.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention drawing projects, participation, notes, presentations, essays, and a .

Format shift

Assessment evidence is entirely in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and confusing course management.

Main concern

Strict participation and and stressful.

What students said

“ if you don't think you're creative.”
10644
“ and if you miss 3 and determines if your absence is excusable.”
10644
“ lectures”
10644

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a and study guide, but several students found the .

Final ExamReview SessionChallenging FinalUnhelpful Study Guide

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review session, but students disagree on whether the exam support was useful.

Final ExamReview SessionChallenging FinalUnhelpful Study Guide
“a ”
20219
“Although the ”
10644
“ "”
10644

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you don't think you're creative.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“ lectures”

⚖️

18/100

“She's a art majors and expects perfection.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

18/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher does NOT post the lecture notes online
  • .
  • Questions are always met with a condescending and snarky tone.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I am currently on the precipice of a B in this class and it threatens to shatter my streak of a 4.0 GPA.
  • how good it looks or visual aesthetic.
  • She is a but attend , and be on time.

Theme 3

🧾

  • and if you miss 3
  • She makes everyone talk and participate every single class session
  • Forced us to present to the class every session

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 12 recent in-person reviews show a consistent pattern of , and communication problems.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

1064411 reviews
202191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 3 · A- 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1