AI Rate Professor

Communication

Jennifer Page

COMM138 · COMM100 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
27.27%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take Jennifer Page only if you can handle uneven communication, group work, and but not low-effort good grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy workloadDelayed gradingMoody communicationTough gradingSome extra credit
  • Many COMM100 students , and .
  • A few students say speeches and can make passing or earning a good grade realistic if all work is completed.
  • COMM100 pattern.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A good grade is possible through completing speeches, group work, and , but students describe the workload and as costly.

Online evidence is harsher about workload, while and speeches can help if students keep up.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The communication content itself is not described as deeply complex, but heavy writing, speeches, and .

Online reviews emphasize weekly assignment volume, while , and vague instructions.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, but participation and speeches matter heavily and some activities require presence.

Attendance evidence comes mainly from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students would not recommend the class because of , and rude or condescending communication.

Both formats include negative recommendations, though the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students often tag her as a and complain that grades are delayed, though and speech completion can soften outcomes.

Format shift

Online reviews stress tough grading and delayed grading, while and some lenient speech grading.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and assignments coming all at once.

Format shift

Online reviews call the GE workload excessive, and in-person reviews describe heavy writing and many assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

A few students find her nice or engaging, but many describe her as rude, moody, vague, or condescending.

Format shift

Online reviews are mostly negative about experience, while but still strongly critical.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Reviews focus more on , and participation than on traditional exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly assignments and speeches, while , and a book-based midterm and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but lean negative, citing demanding workload, moodiness, vague answers, mandatory speeches, and some chances for .

Main concern

In-person students often struggle with , and inconsistent communication.

What students said

“ .”
COMM100
“As long as you do all of your work, you'll most likely get an A or B.”
COMM100

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with students stressing , and .

Main concern

Online students report too much work and .

What students said

“I do not recommend this Professor. Me and .”
COMM100
“Way too much work for a GE class.”
COMM100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy is not consistently described, though and while speeches are mandatory.

Book-Based MidtermBook-Based FinalSpeeches RequiredReviews Do Not Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence says speeches are mandatory and one review says the midterm and final are based on the book, but .

Speeches RequiredBook-Based MidtermBook-Based Final
“Speeches are mandatory to pass the class”
COMM100
“Book isn't required in class but the midterm and .”
COMM100

Online

Online reviews mention coursework and speeches but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Reviews Do Not Prove Online Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This instructor assigns an overwhelming number of coursework in this class and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Very rude and moody when you ask her questions on work.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“She required a lot of writing more so than my English and Philosophy classes combined.”

👍 Recommendation Level

30/100

“I do not recommend this Professor. Me and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • but otherwise she's really condescending and rude.
  • Tends to make you feel dumb about asking a question.
  • Forensics with Jenifer page has been a treat.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Way too much work for a GE class.
  • She tends to throw a lot of so .
  • This instructor assigns an overwhelming number of coursework in this class and .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • As long as you do all of your work, you'll most likely get an A or B.
  • Lots of !
  • She doesn't grade hard on them.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across many years give , and communication problems, though course experiences vary.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

COMM10010 reviews
COMM1381 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1