AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Eunju Lee

MATH141 · MATH150A · MATH041 · MAT150AC · MATH150AC · MATH040 · 148 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Take her only if you are , and are comfortable with and high-stakes exams.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-taught structureHeavy homeworkTest heavyPolarizing lecturesHigh exam risk
  • Reviews are extremely polarized, with and while many warn that the class requires self-teaching.
  • The path to a high grade depends heavily on , and exam review practice.
  • Workload and exam pressure are major risks, especially for students who struggle with math or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

A high grade is possible for prepared students, but it usually , and SI support.

Online reviews include both Easy A claims and failure warnings, while and self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Calculus and math content are challenging, especially because many students say they must learn from videos and move quickly through material.

Both formats describe difficult math content, with online reviews emphasizing video learning and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Some hybrid sections , but other comments warn that missing support or SI sessions can hurt performance.

In-person hybrid reviews show the most flexibility, while online and more on pacing and workload.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

but strongly avoided by students who need live teaching or struggle with math.

Both formats are polarized, with online comments slightly more volatile and in-person comments repeatedly warning about self-teaching.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Grading feels strict because and are limited in many reviews, and several students report failing or withdrawing.

Format shift

, though in-person reviews more often describe low averages and .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

The workload is overwhelming because students mention constant homework, quizzes, lecture videos, review packets, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize overwhelming WebAssign, notes, and quizzes, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Teaching is inconsistent because some students praise clear videos and care, but many say she does not teach enough and forces self-learning.

Format shift

Online reviews are sharply split on video quality, while and reliance on recorded lectures.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Assessment is exam-heavy, with many comments saying tests, finals, and .

Format shift

, and several hybrid in-person reviews say class meetings are mainly for test days.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews often describe hybrid courses where students rely on videos, meet for , and .

Main concern

Many students say the course is exam-heavy and requires teaching yourself from videos.

What students said

“You basically have to teach yourself from the videos she provides that are made by another professor.”
MATH141
“Very test and .”
MATH141
“Only get to .”
MAT150AC

Remote format

Online

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between clear video-based success stories and severe , and punishing exams.

Main concern

Students who struggle with math may feel unsupported and and exams.

What students said

“Her videos suck. .”
MATH150AC
“Her in depth lecture videos are AMAZING!”
MAT150AC
“ , and ”
MATH150A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because grades often , and review-based preparation.

Timed FinalExam-HeavyStudy GuidesNo Curves In Some SectionsOnline Zoom Proctoring Mentioned Once

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe tough exam-focused hybrid sections, with one comment explicitly saying tests were proctored online via Zoom.

Exam-Only Class StructureMock ExamsStudy GuidesOnline Zoom Proctoring
“ .”
MATH150AC
“ .”
MAT150AC
“ ”
MATH150AC

Online

Online reviews mention heavy timed exams and finals, but do not clearly prove webcam rules, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or general proctoring policy.

Timed FinalExam ReviewsNo Curves In Some SectionsExam-Heavy
“2 hours to take a 34 problem final.”
MATH150AC
“Exams make up 85% of the class.”
MAT150AC
“There are no trick questions; only the numbers change.”
MAT150AC

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take her only if you are , and are comfortable with and high-stakes exams.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grade effort; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“You basically have to teach yourself from the videos she provides that are made by another professor.”

📚 Workload

18/100

“ , and ”

⚠️

30/100

“The .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and comprehensive.
  • Doesn't really teach, you must teach yourself.
  • and straight to the point.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Be prepared to work for your grade.
  • Very test and .
  • If you struggle with .

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • 2 hours to take a 34 problem final.
  • Exams make up 85% of the class.
  • Study the and drill problems to study and you'll do fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

148

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews provide many detailed examples across formats, though ratings are highly polarized and clustered around recent controversy.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 550
4 out of 520
3 out of 521
2 out of 520
1 out of 537

Course coverage

MATH150AC16 reviews
MAT150AC14 reviews
MATH14110 reviews
MATH150A5 reviews
MATH0404 reviews
Show 1 more courses
MATH0411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 4 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

7

B 7

C range

3

C 1 · C- 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 2