AI Rate Professor

English

Cara Sharp

ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENG10186 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her only if you want a demanding English class with and and participation.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderReading HeavyParticipation RequiredCaring but StrictEssay Pressure
  • and care, while others strongly warn against the class.
  • She is consistently described as strict, participation-focused, and demanding with reading and writing.
  • Getting an A , and handling tough grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but students describe tough grading, strict rubrics, required participation, and no rounding.

In-person reviews drive the score, while the .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

33/100

The course is challenging because of , and strict classroom expectations.

, while the online review focuses more on support problems than content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

Attendance and participation are strict, with students warning that skipping class can cause failure or being dropped.

Both formats show attendance risk, with online evidence tied to Zoom connection problems and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students are split between strong praise for and and class pressure.

In-person reviews are polarized, while the only online review is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Students repeatedly call her a and one says an 89.7 percent was not rounded up.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews mention a lot of , and class participation.

Format shift

Heavy workload is mainly supported by in-person reviews, while the and lectures.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

She is often praised as caring, smart, and helpful, but several students describe harsh or unaccommodating experiences.

Format shift

but often positive, while the single online review is negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention , and exams.

Format shift

, while online evidence does not clearly define assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized, praising her feedback and care while , and workload.

Main concern

and required participation create high pressure.

What students said

“ an 89.7 percent last semester and didn't round up”
ENG101
“ !”
ENG100
“A very good English teacher!”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is negative and says she was not flexible with technical problems.

Main concern

Technical issues and .

What students said

“She got mad my zoom wouldnt work and the wifi.”
ENG101
“She also wouldnt count me present after I was in class for over an hour and a half and my connection failed.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but and strict consequences for unfinished work.

Timed In-Person EssayPresentation MentionedPop Quizzes MentionedExam Policy Partly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Timed In-Person Essay30 Minute PresentationPop Quizzes Mentioned
“in the and if you run out of time you would get a zero.”
ENG101
“In person Essay, A lot to read, 30 minutes presentation.”
ENG103
“Beware of pop quizzes”
ENGL101

Online

The online review does not clearly .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ an 89.7 percent last semester and didn't round up”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“A very good English teacher! She is smart and if you need any help or clarification.”

⚖️

22/100

“She is a nice person and fun to study with, but she is a .”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“Very nice and knowledgeable but gives a lot of work!”

🚪

8/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has shown care that her students understand what they are given
  • She is smart and if you need any help or clarification.
  • Professor Sharp makes every topic interesting, she gets you thinking of things from different perspectives.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • an 89.7 percent last semester and didn't round up
  • She is a nice person and fun to study with, but she is a .
  • .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Participation

  • In person Essay, A lot to read, 30 minutes presentation.
  • very big on participation. Must have book and don't be tardy
  • Make sure you participate in class and engage in discussion

Theme 4

💻 About Online Experience

  • She got mad my zoom wouldnt work and the wifi.
  • Plus she is not accommodating to student with learning disabilities and is not very explanatory.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 15 reviews cover several years and give detailed, recurring themes despite mixed opinions.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1005 reviews
ENG1014 reviews
ENG1033 reviews
ENGL1012 reviews
ENG101861 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1