Lusiano Orozco

AT150 · AT105 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 10/100
RMP rating: 2.0/5
Take again: 18.75%
Difficulty: 4.7

The decision

Avoid unless you are already independent, thick-skinned, and comfortable teaching yourself most of the material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-study requiredHarsh classroom toneHeavy workloadTough gradingLittle lab guidance

Most students say they must teach themselves and .
, and high difficulty.
A few students respect his experience, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A few prepared students earn high grades, but , and self-teaching.

All .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The content feels harder because and students are expected to already know the material.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Comments and and participation matter, and missing class is risky.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Most students warn against taking him because , and harshly treated.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call him a and .

Format shift

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews mention lots of , and self-directed lab work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews say he is unclear, uninvolved, late, or dismissive when students ask questions.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

The course , and lab tasks rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

teaching, harsh interactions, heavy work, and self-study.

Main concern

Students often feel unsupported and criticized when asking for help.

What students said

“you really have to teach yourself most of the material.”
AT105

“ .”
AT150

“ . Orozco.”
AT105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but , and unclear study expectations.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyUnclear Study Scope

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and broad test preparation, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyUnclear Study Scope

“If you would ask what you needed to study or review, he simply said "everything" and never bothered to further elaborate.”
AT105

“Beware of pop quizzes”
AT150

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ . Orozco.”
Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Doesn't teach, just found us a vehicle and says "work".”

📈 Difficulty and Workload

22/100

“The workload feels heavy, and the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

16/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

you really have to teach yourself most of the material.
Does not teach in , is extremely rude answering questions.
Super knowledgeable and knows his subject, just doesnt really teach the greatest.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Difficulty

Come prepared to work
The workload feels heavy, and the .
BE PREPARE to learn within your group, he will not hold your hands during hands-on activities.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

if you asked questions you would be mocked.
Verbally abusive towards students trying to learn automotive fundamentals.
Dont waste your time or money

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews over many years give detailed and highly consistent warnings, despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 52

1 out of 512

Course coverage

AT1059 reviews

AT1508 reviews

1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

B+ 1

C range

C 1

D range

D 1 · D- 1

F

F 2

No letter grade reported

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 3