AI Rate Professor

English

Mallory Reeves

ENG101C · ENG1 · 100C · ENGL14028 · ENGL103 · ENGL100 · ENGL100C · ENG100 · ENG103 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

Reeves is a must-take English professor, especially for and a realistic path to an A.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExcellent feedbackEasy A with effortCaring and approachableClear writing guidanceFun English class
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Reeves as , and .
  • Grades are consistently high, and many students call the course easy or fair.
  • The , but students say prompts are interesting and deadlines are reasonable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Students repeatedly report A or A+ grades, fair grading, , and easy essays as long as they complete the work.

The Easy A evidence is overwhelmingly from in-person reviews, with the single online review also reporting an A.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Students describe the content as , and especially helpful for people who struggle with English.

In-person reviews strongly support an easy course; the lone online review describes more critical thinking but still a positive experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

Attendance and participation help, but comments describe her as understanding and flexible when students communicate.

In-person comments mention showing up and participation; online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

99/100

Nearly every student strongly recommends her because , and .

Both formats recommend her, but the confidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

High , and supportive feedback make grading very student-friendly.

Format shift

; the online review is positive but less detailed.

Workload

Light

78/100

There are several essays and some reading or freewrites, but students usually call the workload reasonable, easy, or tolerable.

Format shift

; the online review does not give enough workload detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently praise her clear explanations, feedback, humor, kindness, organization, and ability to make English approachable.

Format shift

In-person evidence is extensive and excellent; online evidence is limited but positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The course is mainly essays, writing assignments, freewrites, peer reviews, and .

Format shift

; online assessment details are unclear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are extremely , and easy to succeed with.

Main concern

Students write a lot, so essay-averse students may still feel the workload.

What students said

“You do have to write a lot though.”
ENG101C
“ over a 90 on all of them.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is positive and describes a strong learning experience despite Zoom issues.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so online-specific confidence is limited.

What students said

“Even with the zoom issues, it was still a great learning experience.”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but student-friendly, with comments mentioning few tests and .

Few TestsOpen Response TestEasy Midterm And FinalEssay-Based Work

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention few tests, an open response test, and , but .

Few TestsOpen Response TestEasy Final
“ response.”
ENG100
“Midterm and .”
ENGL103

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, Lockdown Browser, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Would 100% recommend her for those who struggle in english.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“ and is overall a really easy course, but most of .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

99/100

“ easy.”

📈 Easy A Path

94/100

“Put in the work, and an A is not hard to get.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her and concise and also fun.
  • She makes sense on things that I have struggled with throughout previous years.
  • so much more.

Theme 2

📝 About Writing And Feedback

  • .
  • She gives you detailed feedback on .
  • Goes into depth about what .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Overall, she is a 10/10 Professor.
  • Super awesome teacher and !
  • Easy A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is highly credible because 34 reviews across many years are detailed, consistent, and overwhelmingly positive.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG10014 reviews
ENGL1006 reviews
ENG101C5 reviews
ENGL100C4 reviews
100C1 review
Show 4 more courses
ENG11 review
ENG1031 review
ENGL1031 review
ENGL140281 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

31

A+ 14 · A 16 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values