AI Rate Professor

English

Alyssa Garman

ENG103C · ENGL60 · 23959ENG · ENGL102C · ENGLISH60 · 103C · ENGL103 · ENG60 · ENGL100 · ENGLISH100 · ENGLISH1PP · ENG99 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
69.57%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want an engaging English class and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring ProfessorClear Grading CriteriaTough Essay GraderEngaging LecturesParticipation Matters
  • Most in-person students praise her as , and highly supportive.
  • Grading is the main divide, with many students calling her tough .
  • Online reviews are much more negative and , and few high-stakes assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible and common in many in-person reviews, but students must follow instructions, participate, and accept that she rarely gives full credit.

In-person reviews often describe an achievable A with effort, while online reviews .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The and well explained, but , and participation make it more than a low-effort class.

In-person students often find the class easier because lectures and , while online students report a rougher experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and participation matter, and missing class can hurt performance.

, while online evidence mentions tardiness and participation pressure.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and , but the tough grading and online complaints keep the recommendation from being universal.

, while online reviews are mixed to negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

She is often described as tough but clear and fair, with repeated complaints that she rarely gives full credit.

Format shift

Online reviews lean harsh, while as fair.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The , and major essays, but many students say it is manageable when started early.

Format shift

In-person workload is described as manageable but participation-heavy, while online reviews .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students describe her as caring, funny, engaging, and helpful, though a vocal minority reports poor support and rude interactions.

Format shift

, while online feedback is much weaker.

Assessment method

Balanced

54/100

Grades appear , and some tests or finals rather than only exams.

Format shift

, and finals, while online reviews mention few high-impact assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly enthusiastic, , and writing support despite tough grading.

Main concern

Students need to attend, participate, and because .

What students said

“Very caring professor.”
ENG100
“She actually cares about her students and .”
103C
“Professor Garman is a tough but all to get a good grade.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative, with , and limited chances to recover.

Main concern

Online students report tough grading and .

What students said

“She never gives 10/10 points.”
ENG100
“She is not forgiving when it comes to grading and there are .”
ENG103
“She is incredibly judgmental, a .”
ENG103C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews mention midterms, finals, and papers, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring policies.

Final Exam MentionedMidterm MentionedMCQ Final MentionedPaper-Heavy Assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and research paper, with as MCQ, but exam policy details are not clearly proven.

MidtermMCQ FinalResearch Position PaperPaper-Heavy Assessment
“Your overall grade relies mainly on the midterm (100), final (MCQ), and research position paper (150), so focus on those.”
103C
“ , and it is straight from the powerpoints & serial podcast.”
ENG103

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring policies.

Few High-Impact Assignments
“there are .”
ENG103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She genuinely cares and wants you to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She genuinely cares and wants you to succeed.”

⚖️

48/100

“The only thing is she never gives full credit, it's always 8/10 for example.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“ AND !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is one of the .
  • She was super easy to talk to & made 2 hour long lectures pretty fun.
  • Her lectures were never boring!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Attendance does matter and as long as .
  • She is a because she gives you all the tools & expects you to apply them in .
  • She never gives 10/10 points.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very caring professor.
  • She actually cares about her students and .
  • , and wants you to succeed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years give rich and consistent evidence, though .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 539
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 511

Course coverage

ENG10317 reviews
ENGL1007 reviews
ENG1005 reviews
ENGL1035 reviews
ENG604 reviews
Show 9 more courses
103C2 reviews
ENG103C2 reviews
ENGLISH602 reviews
23959ENG1 review
ENG991 review
ENGL102C1 review
ENGL601 review
ENGLISH1001 review
ENGLISH1PP1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 2 · A 20 · A- 2

B range

10

B+ 5 · B 5

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Audit/No Grade 2 · Rather not say 5