AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Angela de Dios

PSY161 · PSY202 · PSY202C · PSY101 · PSY139C · PSY139 · SOC161 · PSYC101 · PSYCHOLOGY101 · 61 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless you want a demanding, self-directed course and are comfortable with and heavy workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing grading systemHeavy workloadTough graderCondescending toneSelf-directed learning
  • Many students describe the workload as , and far beyond normal course expectations.
  • Grading is frequently criticized as items.
  • Some motivated psychology students praise her knowledge and feedback, but the overall experience is highly risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Even students who earn A grades often , and little room for error.

Online has a few easier paths, but both formats repeatedly say the A requires major effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The content and structure feel difficult because students report , and self-teaching.

Online difficulty often comes from weekly modules and videos, while , and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

, and punctuality are treated strictly and can affect success.

In-person evidence clearly shows strict attendance pressure, while and replies.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

because the , and communication style feel punitive and confusing.

Online reviews are more mixed, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough grader and say grades .

Format shift

Online grading is often video-based and confusing, while as stricter and higher stakes.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Many reviews describe constant assignments, , and .

Format shift

Online workload is module-heavy with video discussions, while , and strict preparation.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Some students praise her knowledge, organization, and feedback, but , and weak support.

Format shift

Online reviews include a few strong positives, while and clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment varies across courses, with , and assignments all appearing in reviews.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize video work, discussions, quizzes, and papers, while , and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are more negative, with repeated complaints about , and intense workload.

Main concern

Students report , and an unapproachable classroom experience.

What students said

“her class is honestly a very rigorous full time job, just pick another professor.”
PSY161
“Your entire grade , and if you fail that, you fail the class.”
PSY202C
“if youre a minute late youre marked absent and have to sit in the front/calls you out!”
PSY101

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mixed but often , and substantial weekly work.

Main concern

Online students often struggle with , and .

What students said

“I spent well over 20 hours a week just trying to keep up with the constant assignments.”
PSY161
“Everything you get graded on is by video.”
PSY139
“Expect reading, 1 video discussion (2 replies), 1 assignment .”
PSY139C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style varies by course, with some student-friendly features but many reports of , and .

No Formal Exams In Some Online SectionsWeekly QuizzesThree Midterms And Final In Some CoursesOpen-Note Retakes In One Stats SectionTimed QuizzesHard Tests

Assessment risk

Varies

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exam evidence includes , and grades based heavily on tests in others.

Hard TestsTimed QuizzesOpen-Note Retakes In One SectionTest Heavy
“ and .”
PSY161
“your grade is .”
PSY161
“Grade and .”
PSY161

Online

formal exams and others reporting quizzes, midterms, a cumulative final, and limited exam time.

No Formal Exams In Some SectionsWeekly QuizzesThree MidtermsCumulative FinalLimited Exam Time
“Expect reading, 1 video discussion (2 replies), 1 assignment .”
PSY139C
“She gives weekly quizzes, has 3 midterms, 1 final, 1 term paper, and 2 group projects.”
PSY139
“She doesnt give enough . and the ”
PSY139

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“her class is honestly a very rigorous full time job, just pick another professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Workload Risk

10/100

“I spent well over 20 hours a week just trying to keep up with the constant assignments.”

⚖️

16/100

“The and lacks transparency.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She hardly teaches anything and expects you to learn everything on your own.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • This class demands way more time and effort than a typical 4-unit course.
  • Just started this class and already there are 10 things to read in the module and 5 assignments due this week.
  • Gives lots of homework but .

Theme 2

⚖️

  • The and lacks transparency.
  • Very hard to maintain/get an A because there are so .
  • Your entire grade , and if you fail that, you fail the class.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very condescending, accusatory, and genuinely feeds off the tears of students.
  • She treats you like you should already know everything.
  • Dr. the exams.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

61

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and courses provide detailed, consistent evidence, with a strong negative pattern despite some positive outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 56
3 out of 59
2 out of 55
1 out of 533

Course coverage

PSY13915 reviews
PSY1019 reviews
PSY1618 reviews
PSY2025 reviews
PSY202C5 reviews
Show 4 more courses
PSY139C4 reviews
SOC1612 reviews
PSYC1011 review
PSYCHOLOGY1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 3 · A 10 · A- 2

B range

11

B+ 3 · B 8

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 3