AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rattana Hor

MATH120 · MATH015C · MATH41 · MATH40 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
93.75%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a supportive math class with , and a very realistic path to an A.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy examsExtra creditClear study guidesLenient policiesBeginner friendly
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as , and focused on helping students pass.
  • Grades are very attainable because and is common.
  • , and one older negative review cites organization and lecture clarity issues.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

The A path is unusually easy because , and many students report A grades.

, while the single online review is positive but less specific about grading.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Students describe the coursework and exams as easy when they follow lectures, memorize calculator steps, and use study guides.

In-person reviews provide most of the easy-course evidence, while the online review mainly praises teaching quality.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

67/100

, but he is forgiving about missed classes and late work in several reviews.

In-person reviews include both mandatory attendance and flexibility, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and makes passing very achievable.

Both formats are positive, but the recommendation score is .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

93/100

, late-work flexibility, easy exams, and study guides that .

Format shift

, while online evidence is positive but not grading-specific.

Workload

Light

82/100

Most students say the class does not require much outside studying if they pay attention and use provided materials.

Format shift

, while the online review says students should still be ready to work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students consistently , and easy to follow, with one older outlier criticizing organization.

Format shift

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive, and the single online review is also strongly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Reviews repeatedly mention four exams, a , and tests as the .

Format shift

, while online evidence does not add exam-policy detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, easy tests, and flexible late work.

Main concern

Students still need to attend and follow lecture sheets to keep up.

What students said

“Practice exams are so are different.”
MATH120
“gives and is so lenient towards testing.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is highly positive about teaching but says students should still be ready to work.

Main concern

Online evidence is too limited to judge format-specific policies confidently.

What students said

“Hands down one of the my entire life.”
MATH120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are very student-friendly because practice tests or , and one review says cheat sheets are allowed.

Practice Exams Match TestsCheat Sheet AllowedExtra CreditEasy TestsFour Exams and Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

92/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe easy exams, practice exams that match tests, and a front-and-back cheat sheet, with .

Practice Exams Match TestsCheat Sheet AllowedEasy TestsFour Exams and Final
“Practice exams are so are different.”
MATH120
“He allows us to have a and back.”
MATH120

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, webcam rules, or quiz structure.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Practice exams are so are different.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendations; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“The detailed during lecture and will walk you through everything in class.”

🏆 Easy A Path

94/100

“The course work itself is also easy you just need to memorize all the calculator inputs and tests.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“If you need to take math, take !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • hes very detailed during lecture and will walk you through everything in class.
  • and class can be funny.
  • he goes over everything multiple times.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • gives and is so lenient towards testing.
  • The and he's flexible when it comes to turning things in.
  • study guides were the same as .

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • There is 4 exams and the final.
  • There are 5 tests (4 exams + 1 final) and they are pretty easy
  • as the practice tests!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 16 reviews across several years are highly consistent, though one online review and one older negative outlier limit perfect certainty.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH12011 reviews
MATH402 reviews
MATH412 reviews
MATH015C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 2 · A 11

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values