AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Dai Nguyen

MATH40 · MATH12O · A180 · MATH20 · MATH120 · MATH150AC · MATH020 · MATH219 · MATH150 · MATH180 · STATS · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
56%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can keep pace, attend consistently, and learn independently from notes and reviews.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast-paced lecturesExam reviews mirror testsHeavy workloadMixed teaching clarityAttendance needed
  • Many students say lectures move too fast and require self-teaching.
  • and lecture notes closely match tests.
  • Getting an A is possible, but , and repeated practice.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A , and repeated exam reviews, but many students report heavy effort and fast pacing.

Almost all evidence is in person, while the only online review gives an A+ but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The math content is often described as fast, lecture-heavy, and , especially for weaker math students.

, while the single online review does not describe content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students repeatedly say attendance is needed to pass because and reviews.

Attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, with online.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendations are split, but the volume and intensity of complaints about teaching clarity and pace outweigh the positive exam-review comments.

The online review is positive but isolated, while and often negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some students cite and review-based exams, but others call him a tough or .

Format shift

, and the online review only reports a high grade.

Workload

Heavy

27/100

Reviews frequently mention lots of homework, daily study expectations, lecture-heavy pacing, and .

Format shift

Heavy workload is mainly supported by in-person reviews, with .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A and reviews, but , and unhelpful with questions.

Format shift

The online review praises him vaguely, while but often negative teaching evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades are repeatedly described as , and review guides.

Format shift

Exam-focused evidence is overwhelmingly from in-person reviews, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with many complaints about fast lectures and but .

Main concern

Students who struggle with math may fall behind quickly.

What students said

“The pacing is incredibly fast.”
MATH150
“He provides you with .”
MATH12O
“ .”
MATH180

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is very positive but too vague to support strong conclusions.

Main concern

Evidence is too thin to judge online workload or .

What students said

“This is the so .”
180

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually test-heavy but often similar to review guides, making them manageable for students who practice.

Review-Based ExamsTest HeavyTake-Home Quizzes MentionedExtra Credit Sometimes Offered

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as similar to review guides or lecture problems, though still difficult for some students.

Review-Based ExamsTest HeavyTake-Home Quizzes Mentioned
“ guides.”
MATH150
“ similar to examples.”
MATH120
“The lectures.”
MATH120

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“He goes through lectures extremely fast and because of his accent you can't understand anything.”

📈 A Effort

42/100

“If you are diligent, an A is attainable.”

📝

58/100

“ guides.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The pacing is incredibly fast.
  • Doesn't teach well. And .
  • and easy to follow.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You CANNOT SLACK OR UR COOKED.
  • He gave plenty of .
  • Really makes you work for your grade.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • The handwritten work that you see is what you get on the exams.
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-seven reviews over many years provide rich, consistent themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 524

Course coverage

MATH12011 reviews
MATH409 reviews
A1804 reviews
MATH150AC4 reviews
MATH0203 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH1503 reviews
MATH1803 reviews
1802 reviews
402 reviews
MATH12O2 reviews
MATH202 reviews
MATH2191 review
STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 5 · A 8 · A- 2

B range

2

B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

14

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Pass 2 · Rather_Not_Say 2