AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alex Sevilla

MATH120 · MATH40 · CAL130 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you are willing to keep up, ask questions, and study seriously for exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringHelpfulFast PacedExam HeavyEffort Rewarded
  • Students consistently describe Sevilla as caring and willing to help.
  • In-person MATH120 has sharply mixed reactions because the pace and .
  • Online reviews are more positive and focus on support, clarity, and a calm class environment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

Getting an A appears possible with effort and opportunities, but unless you are very strong at math.

Online evidence is positive but vague on grades, while is to earn an A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material can be understandable with help, but the and math content make it more than an easy course.

Online reviews describe clearer support, while in-person MATH120 includes one strong warning about fast pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as mandatory, but students say paying attention in class is important to passing.

Only in-person reviews clearly discuss class attention, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend him because , and wants students .

Online reviews are strongly positive, while because of pace and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

He offers chances to do well, but some students.

Format shift

, while online reviews mostly discuss support.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not heavily detailed, but one review tags lots of homework and several comments stress doing the work.

Format shift

, while online evidence only says students should do the work and ask questions.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students mostly describe him as caring, helpful, and good at explaining, with and speed.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is consistently positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

One detailed in-person review says the grade is basically based on exams, and no review gives strong evidence of .

Format shift

Exam-heavy evidence comes from in-person MATH120, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and a fast pace that can make exams difficult.

Main concern

A student says the class moves fast and the .

What students said

“Moves really fast through the courses and if u don't pay attention in class you will not pass.”
MATH120
“ and gives a LOT of opportunity to do well.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students describe him as caring, helpful, and .

Main concern

The online reviews do not .

What students said

“This professor is a really nice and caring person.”
MATH40
“Made you actually understand the material as a good professor should!”
CAL130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The strongest exam evidence is that , but comments do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policies.

Exam HeavyReviews Do Not Clearly Prove ProctoringReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Open Book

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and can be difficult.

Exam HeavyDifficult Exams
“Your grade is basically based on how you do on the exams.”
MATH120
“Impossible to get an A unless ur a genius.”
MATH120

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and only wants his students to do well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, pace, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Made you actually understand the material as a good professor should!”

👍 Recommendation Level

78/100

“Amazing professor, if more were like him we would not have a hard time in college.”

📘 Grade Effort

45/100

“Impossible to get an A unless ur a genius.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and only wants his students to do well.
  • He helps you when you need it.
  • He's a nice guy but he's not very good at explaining everything.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Your grade is basically based on how you do on the exams.
  • Just put in the effort and you will pass!!
  • Moves really fast through the courses and if u don't pay attention in class you will not pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they include recent comments across both online and in-person formats with useful detail.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1202 reviews
CAL1301 review
MATH401 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1