AI Rate Professor

Computer Graphics

Paul Wenner

MAD122 · MAD112C · MAD1222 · MAD112 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and stay constantly updated on Canvas.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized deadlinesOutdated teaching styleAttendance sensitiveGroup projectsCaring but inconsistent
  • Student experiences are sharply split, with but most older reviews negative.
  • The biggest recurring , and grading expectations.
  • Grades can be good, but students and strict deadline handling.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Good grades appear possible, but students , and unclear expectations as the real cost of earning them.

Online and in-person evidence both mention deadline pressure, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content is not always described as intellectually hard, but disorganization and it should.

, while in-person reviews emphasize confusing class structure and limited learning.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several reviews say missing class or late walk-ins can seriously hurt success or grades.

Both formats include skip-class warnings, but the strictest attendance .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

because they find the course disorganized, outdated, and stressful despite some signs of care.

Online reviews are mixed, while positive exception.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report , and severe penalties for attendance or deadline issues.

Format shift

, while online reviews also mention zeroes for late project completion.

Workload

Heavy

31/100

Projects are described as large, rushed, and sometimes due by the end of class or within two class periods.

Format shift

Both formats mention project pressure, with online reviews highlighting short turnaround times and .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Comments describe him as caring and sometimes fun, but the , and .

Format shift

Online teaching is mixed, while classroom environment and learning value.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and assignment deadlines rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point to project-based assessment with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

strong recent review praising his care and forgiving style.

Main concern

In-person students report and an outdated, disorganized classroom experience.

What students said

“ and causing to be marked as missing and lower your grade.”
MAD122
“ and .”
MAD122

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews show mixed outcomes, with one very positive short review but and rushed deadlines.

Main concern

Online students and tight due dates independently.

What students said

“ and it was a bit of a mess to get through”
MAD1222
“his course material was super ”
MAD112C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , so comments.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book, midterm, final, or quiz policy.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“his course material was super .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and deadlines. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ .”

⚖️

28/100

“gave me a %50 because I missed class even though i still turned in a !”

📌 Workload Pressure

31/100

“He'll assign a big project and makes it due within two class periods”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Outdated teaching style and .
  • He is a nice person, but I wouldn't say good at teaching.

Theme 2

📅 About Deadlines

  • and causing to be marked as missing and lower your grade.
  • his course material was super

Theme 3

❤️ About Positive Experiences

  • Genuinely amazing. I have taken 2 classes with him and loved both.
  • He is very fun and forgiving, within reason of course.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across several years give useful but uneven evidence, with strong disagreement between the newest positive review and older negative reviews.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MAD112C3 reviews
MAD1223 reviews
MAD1121 review
MAD12221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values