AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Timothy Choi

STATS120 · MATH100C · STAT120 · A180 · MATH24 · MATH120 · MATH130 · MATH250B · MATH250AC · MATH120C · MATH100 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
45%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

if you can keep up with fast math lectures, attend consistently, and study heavily for exams.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFast Paced LecturesHeavy HomeworkTest HeavyMixed HelpfulnessStrict Attendance
  • Students consistently describe the course as , and exam-heavy.
  • Positive , and allows cheat sheets or .
  • Negative reviews report confusing , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and serious test preparation.

The in-person evidence shows hard but passable courses with effort, while the as .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The material is often described as , and difficult even when homework or cheat sheets help.

In-person reviews dominate the evidence and repeatedly mention fast lectures, while the online review .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Many students say skipping class leads to failure, and one review describes absences as not being excused.

; the single online review does not clearly discuss attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Students recommend him only for disciplined learners who can handle heavy work and .

In-person reviews are polarized, while the only online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

and , but students also report hard tests and point deductions.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention cheat sheets and , while the online review says homework .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

, and exams are repeatedly described as taking a lot of time.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work, with the online review emphasizing difficult tests and .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students praise his organization and help, but many say he is confusing, fast, or poor at explaining material.

Format shift

In-person reviews are highly mixed, while the single online review describes a poor teaching experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly describe the course as completion credit.

Format shift

Both online and as the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with strong praise for help and organization but frequent , and confusion.

Main concern

Students often say missing class or falling behind makes the course very difficult to recover from.

What students said

“This class will require alot of work but as long as you commit yourself to doing said work and studying hard for .”
MATH120
“He teaches super fast and .”
STAT120

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online , and poor teaching support.

Main concern

as and too long for the time allowed.

What students said

“the ”
A180

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exams are usually described as hard and central to the grade, but .

Test HeavyCheat Sheet AllowedHard Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

54/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

evidence that one-page cheat sheets are allowed.

Test HeavyCheat Sheet AllowedHard Exams
“he also lets you do a one-page cheat sheet. for all exams”
MATH120C
“The .”
MATH130

Online

The and too long, but it does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Hard TestsTime Pressure
“the time he gives you.”
A180

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class will require alot of work but as long as you commit yourself to doing said work and studying hard for .”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“He teaches super fast and .”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“ .”

⚖️ Grade Effort

38/100

“I am bad at math but and studied on top of that in order to get A's on all the tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He is unable to properly teach.
  • He teaches quite fast, but as long as you come to class and do the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Probably the hardest class .
  • The .
  • He allows cheat-sheets, which are where you can put equations down so you don't have to worry about remembering them.

Theme 3

🧭

  • .
  • He WONT excuse any absence unless you're straight up dying.
  • He teaches at a rate of 1000000mph.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

There are 20 reviews across many years with consistent , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH120C7 reviews
MATH1203 reviews
STAT1202 reviews
A1801 review
MATH1001 review
Show 6 more courses
MATH100C1 review
MATH1301 review
MATH241 review
MATH250AC1 review
MATH250B1 review
STATS1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 3