AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Alireza(ali) Moady

CIS182 · CIS179 · CIS185 · CIS191 · CIS · CIS161 · ADOBEPDF · CIS266 · CIS179220 · WEBPAGEDESIGN · CIS188 · CIS121 · CIS120 · CIS189 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

if you can teach yourself and mainly want an easy grade, because teaching quality is risky.

Best fit · Self Taught ProEasy gradesPoor claritySlow and repetitive lecturesWeak online supportInconsistent help
  • Many students say the classes are easy and grades can be high with basic assignment completion.
  • The dominant complaint is poor lecture clarity, slow pacing, weak communication, and outdated or .
  • Online evidence is split, with one very positive online review and one strongly negative online review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Grades appear easy because many reviews , and A or B outcomes despite weak teaching.

, but online comments are more mixed about the experience.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course tasks are often described as easy or simple, .

Online and in-person reviews both suggest low content difficulty, though .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Some reviews mention demanded attention or , while others describe flexibility with late work and support.

Online reviews show deadline flexibility, while and attention.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most recent and because unclear lectures, poor communication, and disorganization outweigh the easy grades.

Online evidence is split, but and recent reviews are mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Students repeatedly report easy tests, simple assignments, late-work leniency, and easy A or B outcomes.

Format shift

Both online and .

Workload

Light

76/100

Assignments are often described as easy or simple, though some students say they are long, repetitive, or based on screenshots.

Format shift

Online reviews mention easy but , while in-person reviews often call the class easy.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Many reviews describe him as hard to understand, repetitive, slow, disorganized, unresponsive, or not really teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews conflict, but in-person reviews and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and practice questions more than rigorous exams.

Format shift

Both formats mostly point to assignment-heavy work, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews mostly describe an easy class but and poor organization.

Main concern

The main concern is that students often cannot understand the lectures and may need to rely on books or assignments.

What students said

“Incoherent professor who is well past his prime.”
CIS185
“Easy A as long as you put your effort on it.”
CIS121
“He isn't teaching. He's just making you buy a book to read it.”
CIS120

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with one student calling him helpful and easy while another says the online lectures were unbearable and self-teaching was required.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent online teaching quality and weak lecture engagement.

What students said

“His assignments are easy, maybe a little long but he lets you turn them in late and ”
CIS191
“I feel I learned more from the book then himself.”
CIS185

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally described as easy, but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Easy ExamsPractice QuestionsMandatory Final MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention easy tests, practice questions, and , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Easy TestsPractice QuestionsMandatory Final Mentioned
“ ”
CIS179
“memorize the practice questions then you should do just fine”
CIS121
“i wouldn't be able to take his final, it is mandatory since this was an online class”
ADOBEPDF

Online

Online reviews mention easy exams, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Easy ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ .”
CIS191

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A as long as you put your effort on it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

34/100

“He isn't teaching. He's just making you buy a book to read it.”

🎓 Easy Grade

82/100

“Everyone gets A or B in his class easy.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

28/100

“Avoid if possible.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very hard to understand; not just thick accent, but heavily repetitive in a way that makes it difficult to understand overall meaning.
  • Oh god. Can't understand anything he's saying
  • He does repeat himself too many times but sometimes some people need that.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A as long as you put your effort on it.
  • His assignments are easy, maybe a little long but he lets you turn them in late and
  • , and the but you learn.

Theme 3

💬 About Support & Organization

  • and .
  • Plenty of links are out of date on the Canvas page for class.
  • and all aspects of his courses.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The score is based on 21 reviews across a long time span, with and frequent complaints about unclear teaching.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CIS1854 reviews
CIS1213 reviews
CIS2 reviews
CIS1612 reviews
ADOBEPDF1 review
Show 9 more courses
CIS1201 review
CIS1791 review
CIS1792201 review
CIS1821 review
CIS1881 review
CIS1891 review
CIS1911 review
CIS2661 review
WEBPAGEDESIGN1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1