AI Rate Professor

Science

Beverly Berekian

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid if possible, because the , and mismatched tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesTests do not match lecturesUnderpreparedDull deliveryTest heavy
  • Both reviews rate the teaching experience very poorly and describe .
  • Students say labs.
  • The small review count limits certainty, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Both reported grades are Bs, but comments suggest students must self-study through and .

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The class feels difficult because , and students are expected to know material before lecture.

Course difficulty .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but late and underprepared lectures make class time unreliable rather than clearly flexible.

Only in-person reviews mention class behavior, and no online evidence exists.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

No reviewer recommends the class, and , and weak preparation.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tests are described as confusing and not aligned with lectures, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Reviews emphasize reading, labs, lectures, and tests, but do not prove an .

Format shift

Workload evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Both students describe lectures as .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in-person and consistently negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

, and test confusion more than assignments.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently , and underprepared teaching.

Main concern

The main concern is that students may need to learn material before or outside lecture because .

What students said

“the lectures made no sense and not helpful.”
12206
“ ”
12206
“Beverly appears late to class often and under prepared.”
12206

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as confusing and poorly aligned with lectures, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring policies.

Confusing TestsTests Do Not Match LecturesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

match lectures, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring policies.

Confusing TestsTests Do Not Match Lectures
“ .”
12206
“ ”
12206

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ Different types of learners may find this class difficult.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and class preparation. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

10/100

“the lectures made no sense and not helpful.”

🧪 Test Alignment

25/100

“ ”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

5/100

“if it was up to me i wouldn't”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the lectures made no sense and not helpful.
  • She is unmotivated while lecturing and you are expected to know the information BEFORE lecture.
  • Beverly appears late to class often and under prepared.

Theme 2

🧪

  • she didn't really go over the labs
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 in-person reviews are available, but they are recent and highly consistent in their negative teaching and testing themes.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

122062 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values