AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Martin Young

PHILO106 · PHIL101 · PHIL170C · PHIL202 · PHIL106 · PHIL100C · PHIL172 · PHIL170 · PHIL135C · PHIL110 · PHIL100 · 64 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take him only if you can handle reading, papers, and than online sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny but inconsistentHeavy reading and papersConfusing instructionsHelpful in personWeak online communication
  • , and ability to make philosophy interesting.
  • Online reviews are much more negative, , and disorganized course setup.
  • Grades can be manageable with effort, but workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible because , and , but unclear instructions and heavy work keep it from being effortless.

In-person reviews more often call the class an easy A, while online reviews more often stress workload and confusion.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The philosophy content is often approachable when explained well, but , and .

In-person students report clearer support than online students, who more often describe the course as unclear and stressful.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

because , and participation help students understand what will be assessed.

, while online reviews focus more on communication and module issues.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

and support, but many warn against him because of confusion, workload, and poor online structure.

, while online reviews are much more cautionary.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Several students call him easy or mention , but and vague paper expectations.

Format shift

In-person reviews contain most of the easy-grade evidence, while online reviews .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of reading, frequent quizzes, papers, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention workload, but online reviews describe it as especially stressful and compressed.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

He is often described as funny, knowledgeable, and caring, but the and communication fail.

Format shift

, while online teaching has repeated complaints about disorganization and silence.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews , and rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

, and tests, while online reviews focus more on assignments and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more positive, praising humor, knowledge, helpfulness, and .

Main concern

Some students find lectures, paper prompts, and .

What students said

“Definitely a lot of work, but .”
PHIL170
“This class is really easy if you just follow the directions.”
PHIL100
“ .”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly split but often , and heavy workload.

Main concern

Students may need to manage vague directions and delayed communication on their own.

What students said

“No communication, plenty of stress.”
PHIL135C
“Zero communication with students...”
PHIL100
“THERE'S A LOT OF WORK.”
PHIL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, papers, and some tests, but they do not clearly prove a .

QuizzesPapersTestsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and tests, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Weekly QuizzesPapersTestsExtra Credit
“ , and a .”
PHIL170
“just 3 tests and 3 papers, as well as an .”
PHIL172

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, Lockdown Browser, midterm, or .

AssignmentsPapers
“ .”
PHIL100
“ !”
PHIL170C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No communication, plenty of stress.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Dr. Young is an excellent Philosophy instructor.”

⚖️ Grade Value

62/100

“But overall easy A!”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“LOTS OF WORK!! be prepared to read a lot.”

💻 Online Risk

45/100

“One of the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .
  • Dr. Young is hilarious.
  • His lecture cannot be understand and it's not that I don't agree with what he has to say but rather I cannot understand a thing he says.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A. Do the work and the rest takes care of itself.
  • you really need to work hard.
  • A lot of opportunities.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • The shell was unpublished for two weeks after the semester started.
  • Zero communication with students...
  • No communication, plenty of stress.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

64

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The profile has 50 reviews across many years and formats, with consistent themes despite mixed opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 513
3 out of 57
2 out of 54
1 out of 58

Course coverage

PHIL10028 reviews
PHIL1707 reviews
PHIL100C3 reviews
PHIL1013 reviews
PHIL170C2 reviews
Show 6 more courses
PHIL2022 reviews
PHIL1061 review
PHIL1101 review
PHIL135C1 review
PHIL1721 review
PHILO1061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values