AI Rate Professor

History

Michelle Stonis

270C · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want an engaging history class and are comfortable with participation, group work, and a moderate challenge.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerEngaging LecturesKnowledgeableParticipation MattersGroup WorkMixed Recommendation
  • Positive reviews praise her lectures, knowledge, and willingness to help students with papers.
  • The course appears demanding, with participation and group work playing a real role.
  • Recommendation is mixed because one brief negative review strongly objects to the professor and grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

One student earned an A, but , and group work suggest an A takes real effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The class is intellectually engaging but not easy, with participation, group work, and higher difficulty ratings.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Participation matters and one tag says skipping class risks failing, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most detailed reviews recommend her for engaging lectures and help, but one .

and mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

The tough-grader tag and high difficulty .

Format shift

, and they conflict between clear criteria and .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Group work, participation, papers, and high difficulty ratings make the workload feel heavy.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Two detailed reviews describe her as engaging, knowledgeable, helpful, and clear.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is only in-person and is mostly positive despite one brief negative review.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Reviews mention participation, group work, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and support, balanced by one negative recommendation and tough-grader signal.

Main concern

Participation, group work, and low-effort class.

What students said

“Great way of teaching, very enjoyable, and smooth.”
270C
“Group work is required so beware if that's not your thing.”
270C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book status, or final structure.

Exam Policy Unclear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great class so far! Professor Stonis is smart and knowledgeable about history.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Great way of teaching, very enjoyable, and smooth.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

68/100

“ !”

⚖️

35/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great way of teaching, very enjoyable, and smooth.
  • Professor Stonis is smart and knowledgeable about history.
  • Her lectures are interesting.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Participation

  • Group work is required so beware if that's not your thing.
  • and she even looks over your paper during peer review.

Theme 3

👍 About Recommendation

  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, and the opinions are polarized across a long time span.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

270C3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values