AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Robert Grantham

COS126 · COUN140 · COUN101 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take him for COUN 140 if you want a practical class, but consider another counselor for sensitive or detailed advising.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing counselorHelpful in COUN 140Unsupportive advisingPractical when engagedInconsistent experience
  • COUN 140 students often describe him as helpful, practical, and chill.
  • Counseling and advising reviews are sharply negative, especially about support and useful guidance.
  • The experience depends heavily on whether students need a class instructor or personal academic advising.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

Course difficulty appears low in the positive COUN 140 reviews, but grade evidence is too sparse to call it an easy A.

The usable grade-effort evidence comes mainly from in-person COUN 140 reviews, while the online review is advising-focused and not useful for grading.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

COUN 140 is described as useful, practical, and not very difficult, though advising reviews do not measure course content well.

, while the single online review concerns counseling rather than course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

There is , but one COUN 140 tag says participation matters.

, and the online review does not clarify attendance expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends on context because class reviews are positive but counseling reviews include serious dissatisfaction.

In-person evidence is mixed by course type, while the only online review is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

There is by few things and no strong evidence of harsh grading.

Format shift

Grading evidence comes from in-person COUN 140 only, with .

Workload

Light

75/100

Difficulty ratings for positive class reviews are low, and comments .

Format shift

, while the online advising review gives no workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching and counseling quality are highly inconsistent, with strong praise in COUN 140 and strong complaints in advising contexts.

Format shift

In-person reviews are polarized, while the single online review is negative and advising-focused.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews provide little exam evidence and one tag suggests grading by .

Format shift

Only in-person class reviews mention assessment, and online evidence does not describe course assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

COUN 140 and strong criticism of counseling support.

Main concern

Advising support is inconsistent and can feel dismissive.

What students said

“ and practical.”
COUN140
“Do yourself a favor, and !”
COS126
“I feel like a number rather than a person.”
COUN101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is a negative counseling experience about missing important program information.

Main concern

The student felt crucial advising information was not provided.

What students said

“I am really dissatisfied with him as a counselor.”
COS126

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

The online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and practical.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting the split between positive COUN 140 teaching and negative counseling experiences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“One of the most useful classes I've taken so far.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

45/100

“I would suggest visiting another counselor, especially if you are a business major.”

⚖️ Experience Split

55/100

“he is very chill and he just wants the !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Class Experience

  • One of the most useful classes I've taken so far.
  • he's helpful and
  • he is very chill and he just wants the !

Theme 2

🧭 About Counseling Support

  • I didn't feel that supported with this counselor
  • Not knowledgeable or helpful
  • I feel like a number rather than a person.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Consistency

  • I am really dissatisfied with him as a counselor.
  • and practical.
  • Do yourself a favor, and !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only 8 reviews across a long time span and they mix counseling with class experiences.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

COS1263 reviews
COUN1403 reviews
COUN1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1