AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Tony Hoang

ENGT103 · ENGT1O3 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take him only if you can learn independently and manageable.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest HeavyHard FinalEasy ClassTough GraderWeak Explanations
  • , while one says he does not teach enough difficult material.
  • The class can feel easy if students follow along, but tests and the as hard.
  • Grades may depend on .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The course can be easy for students who follow along, but and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Students say the class is not very difficult overall, but and .

Course easiness .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

Two students recommend him, but the negative review strongly criticizes teaching quality and test preparation.

Recommendation and is mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

One tag calls him a and another says grades depend on few things, but one student still earned an A+.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The course is described as easy overall, but , and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Two reviews are positive or neutral, but one detailed review says he relies on the textbook and does not teach difficult material.

Format shift

online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Multiple reviews use test-heavy language and mention a .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a generally easy but and .

Main concern

The biggest concern is weak instruction for difficult material paired with .

What students said

“Not very difficult if following along.”
ENGT103
“Does not teach at all.”
ENGT1O3
“The class is easy but the difficult material in class nor in book.”
ENGT1O3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show hard, test-heavy assessment, but they do .

Test HeavyHard FinalFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , but no clear exam policy is proven.

Test HeavyHard FinalFew Graded Items
“ but overall i think it was fair.”
ENGT103
“ the difficult material in class nor in book.”
ENGT1O3
“You can only earn 100 points in his class.”
ENGT1O3

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class is easy but the difficult material in class nor in book.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, difficulty, and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Does not teach at all.”

📈 Course Difficulty

66/100

“Not very difficult if following along.”

🧪

42/100

“ but overall i think it was fair.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • good prof overall
  • Does not teach at all.
  • He goes over textbook and does not provide examples other than book.

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests

  • but overall i think it was fair.
  • the difficult material in class nor in book.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Not very difficult if following along.
  • The class is easy but the difficult material in class nor in book.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

and negative detail, but two are old and one is very brief.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGT1032 reviews
ENGT1O31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values