AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Sally McNay

NURS191 · NURS192 · N193 · NURSING190 · NURS193 · PHARM191 · NURS296 · NURSING · NURS666 · NURS000 · PHARMNURSING · N296 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her only if you can learn heavily from the book and and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized LecturesConfusing ExamsCaring in ClinicalTough GraderSelf-Study Heavy
  • Many students say she is caring and .
  • Lecture reviews are strongly negative, with repeated complaints about disorganization and .
  • Exams are described as , and sometimes disconnected from lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students report tricky exams, vague guidance, and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The nursing content , and test material students say is not well covered.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person nursing reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

At least one review directly warns that skipping class means you will not pass, and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most recent and because lectures and and unfair.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tough grading, few graded items, tricky tests, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students often need to read and teach themselves because lectures do not reliably cover tested material.

Format shift

Workload evidence is in person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

She is often described as caring or nice, but many students and ineffective.

Format shift

In-person clinical reviews , and there is no online evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments emphasize exams, test questions, and few .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but mostly warn that lectures are weak while .

Main concern

Students repeatedly say lectures do not prepare them well for exams.

What students said

“HER LECTURES ARE USELESS!”
NURS296
“So far we have taken 2 exams and she made mistakes in the questions and answers but refuses to accept that she is wrong!”
N296
“Great clinical teacher. Very supportive and nurturing.”
N193

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as , and sometimes disconnected from lecture material, but reviews do not clearly prove book or .

Confusing ExamsTricky TestsFew Graded ItemsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe difficult and , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring policies.

Confusing ExamsTricky TestsFew Graded ItemsTest Heavy
“SHE THROWS RANDOM QUESTIONS IN THE NOT IN THE OBJECTIVES.”
NURS296
“The ! They are very tricky so STUDY HARD!”
NURSING190
“So far we have taken 2 exams and she made mistakes in the questions and answers but refuses to accept that she is wrong!”
N296

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ms. McNay is a very nice and helpful person, and she's very helpful with clinical skills. and sometimes she has incorrect information in them.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and clinical support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Prof McNay presents herself as . However, she cannot teach.”

🧪

25/100

“SHE THROWS RANDOM QUESTIONS IN THE NOT IN THE OBJECTIVES.”

❤️ Clinical Support

58/100

“She truly cares about her students and if you need help.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are bad & they have been the last 2yrs.
  • She gives the .
  • She goes off on tangents and tells stories rather than course content.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The ! They are very tricky so STUDY HARD!
  • Get ready to read

Theme 3

❤️ About Clinical Support

  • She is a great clinical instructor.
  • Great clinical teacher. Very supportive and nurturing.
  • She is not for any Sensitive Sallys though, as she is one of the realest and brutally honest person that I know.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 23 in-person reviews span many years and repeat the same lecture and .

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 58
1 out of 56

Course coverage

NURS1934 reviews
N2963 reviews
NURS2963 reviews
N1932 reviews
NURSING2 reviews
Show 8 more courses
NURSING1902 reviews
2921 review
NURS0001 review
NURS1911 review
NURS1921 review
NURS6661 review
PHARM1911 review
PHARMNURSING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values