AI Rate Professor

Economics

Mary Odebunmi

ECON100 · ECON105 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid this professor unless , and mostly self-directed learning.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh GraderDisorganizedPoor CommunicationNo TeachingHigh Drop Risk
  • Reviews across both formats are uniformly , and communication.
  • Students repeatedly report unclear Canvas materials, slow or , and harsh deductions.
  • Several students describe dropping the class or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and multiple withdrawals.

Both formats describe hard grading, with online reviews especially emphasizing unexplained deductions and drops.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The economics content is made much harder by unclear instructions, little teaching, messy course setup, and difficult tests.

Online reviews focus on disorganized Canvas and no teaching, while and communication problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

30/100

and course management problems, but do not clearly state a .

Neither format clearly .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

Students overwhelmingly because of , and hostile or delayed communication.

Both online and recommendation support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Students repeatedly call her a and , and failing by narrow margins.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize unexplained deductions, while and discussions.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

The workload is stressful because assignments, textbook-based quizzes, tests, and .

Format shift

Online reviews describe unclear assignments and textbook-based quizzes and tests, while , and difficult tests.

Teaching experience

Awful

3/100

Reviews consistently say she does , and communicates poorly or rudely.

Format shift

Both formats are severely negative, with online reviews giving the strongest detail about no teaching and broken course organization.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews , and a group project, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, assignments, and a group project, while , and discussion posts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews also , and poor teaching.

Main concern

Students report , and very poor communication.

What students said

“ and it felt that some of the questions were not relevant to what we were learning.”
ECON105
“She responds to nearly every email you send her with attitude or annoyance, and and discussion posts.”
ECON100
“She cant teach to save her life.”
ECON100

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews report broken Canvas links, wrong , and multiple drops.

Main concern

Students say the , and poorly supported.

What students said

“She does literally no teaching and is the .”
ECON105
“ , and her syllabus was gibberish not corresponding to the class.”
ECON105
“Class started with 35 people and by the third week 28 had dropped.”
ECON105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support difficult tests, textbook-based quizzes, and , but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Difficult TestsTextbook-Based QuizzesUnclear Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Difficult TestsHard Grading
“ and it felt that some of the questions were not relevant to what we were learning.”
ECON105

Online

Online reviews mention textbook-based quizzes and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Textbook-Based QuizzesTextbook-Based TestsUnclear Grading
“The quizzes and common/example scenarios.”
ECON105
“ because what I get from tests and what is on the .”
ECON100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“M. Odebunmi is, by far, the worst professor at Cypress College.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

3/100

“She does literally no teaching and is the .”

⚖️

5/100

“ .”

📩 Communication

0/100

“Took her nearly 2 weeks to respond to one of my emails.”

⚠️ Student Risk

0/100

“Class started with 35 people and by the third week 28 had dropped.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does literally no teaching and is the .
  • She cant teach to save her life.
  • M. Odebunmi is, by far, the worst professor at Cypress College.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She will intentionally deduce grades to ensure that you fail and will attack you for reaching out for .
  • .
  • She grades harshly and when asked.

Theme 3

📩 About Communication

  • Emails takes days to get a response.
  • Took her nearly 2 weeks to respond to one of my emails.
  • She responds to nearly every email you send her with attitude or annoyance, and and discussion posts.

Theme 4

🧭 About Organization

  • Canvas links never work, so assignment.
  • , and her syllabus was gibberish not corresponding to the class.
  • The assignments and and unorganized and the Professor was so dismissive to emails - horrible combo.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven detailed reviews across multiple years and both formats are highly consistent in negative experiences.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 511

Course coverage

ECON1057 reviews
ECON1004 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1