AI Rate Professor

Economics

Fola Odebunmi

ECON105ONLINE · ECON100 · ECON100105 · ECON105 · ECON101 · ECON100ONLINE · ECON100C · ECON105C · 115 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
54.17%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself, handling heavy structure, and actively seeking help.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy WorkloadPoor CommunicationGroup ProjectsSelf Teaching
  • Reviews are highly polarized, but many , and harsh grading.
  • The course , and group projects.
  • Students who are independent, persistent, and use office hours sometimes report learning a lot and earning good grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Good grades are possible, but students repeatedly describe high , and few forgiving grade items.

Online has a few easy-grade comments but mostly self-teaching and , while and grade-damaging group work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Economics content is repeatedly described as difficult, fast, test heavy, and hard .

Both formats are challenging, with online students relying more on textbook work and and difficult tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Participation and being called out in class.

and participation pressure, while online reviews mention weekly chat and required participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Many students warn against taking her because of , and limited help despite some positive reports from persistent students.

Both formats include positive outliers, but online complaints focus on self-teaching and communication while , and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Many reviews call her a , and group projects that can sharply lower grades.

Format shift

Strict grading appears in both formats, with online reviews emphasizing few points and and participation deductions.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and Pearson work.

Format shift

Online workload is textbook and platform heavy, while and in-class group work.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students find her caring and knowledgeable, but , and feeling unsupported.

Format shift

Online teaching is often described as textbook-based self-learning, while in-person teaching and .

Assessment method

Balanced

70/100

Grades , and group projects, with tests and group projects frequently emphasized.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework, quizzes, exams, and group projects, while , and high-stakes group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are also split, with some praising high standards and office-hour help but , and stressful participation.

Main concern

Students report , and pressure to participate.

What students said

“ , and !”
ECON105
“This class is difficult but a lot of learning support.”
ECON100105
“ and are 120/620 pts of your grade.”
ECON105

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews often describe textbook-driven , and limited instructor-created support.

Main concern

Students may need to rely heavily on the textbook and .

What students said

“basically had to .”
ECON100C
“She provided no learning material other than the text.”
ECON105ONLINE
“it's basically a textbook website that .”
ECON100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and few grade items, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, closed-book, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Test HeavyBook Based ExamsFew Grade ItemsGroup Projects

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and group projects, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policies.

Test HeavyFinal ExamGroup Projects
“The class information is interesting and the .”
ECON100C
“The . It had trick q's and is 12 % of grade.”
ECON105
“10/10 people I asked got a C on the final.”
ECON100105

Online

, and few grade items, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or Lockdown Browser policies.

QuizzesBook Based ExamsFew Grade Items
“The and a group project.”
ECON100ONLINE
“The exams and book so that was good.”
ECON100
“You earn your grade with very few points 580 total, and 100 are group projects.”
ECON105ONLINE

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There's no guidance in this class and you're gonna have to figure things out on your own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“basically had to .”

⚖️

24/100

“Even your answer is right, but if it's not the way she want you to answer or .”

📚 Workload Demand

25/100

“Professor Odebunmi has high expectations. The class is demanding but doable if you complete the assignments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She lacks communication and literally tells you what you already know and what you need to know.
  • She is very knowledgeable. and her class is interesting.
  • She is hard to understand and drifts off into random topics a lot.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • I would but still always got the .
  • Read everything - Professor Odebunmi does not play.
  • If you complete all of the required work, you will pass.

Theme 3

🧩

  • .
  • and are 120/620 pts of your grade.
  • The group work is a , but she answers all of your questions.

Theme 4

⚠️ About Communication

  • terrible communication.
  • She always followed up with canvas emails.
  • If you ask for and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

115

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and both formats provide strong, detailed, and consistent evidence despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 512
3 out of 510
2 out of 522
1 out of 553

Course coverage

ECON10513 reviews
ECON100C9 reviews
ECON100ONLINE7 reviews
ECON1017 reviews
ECON1004 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ECON1001054 reviews
ECON105C3 reviews
ECON105ONLINE2 reviews
1051 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 5

B range

18

B+ 3 · B 11 · B- 4

C range

7

C+ 5 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2