AI Rate Professor

Art

Daniela Gutierrez

ART110 · ART216 · ART110C · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if you like art and , but if you need tight organization and low workload.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate about artEngaging lecturesHeavy homeworkHelpful but demanding
  • Online reviews are strongly positive, with easy content and fair tests.
  • and complaints about workload or organization.
  • Grades look reachable, but the and attendance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic because the work is not described as hard, but students must keep up with and class expectations.

Online evidence sounds easier and fairer, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The material is approachable and interesting, but the workload and organization issues add practical difficulty.

Online reviews call the class very easy, while hard concepts.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

and a direct warning to attend class.

Attendance concerns come from in-person reviews, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Students recommend her for passion and helpful teaching, but the .

Online reviews are fully positive, while and serious complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

Grades look attainable and one review mentions clear criteria, but comments .

Format shift

Online tests are described as fair, while but not harsh.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

Workload ranges from moderate online to a lot of homework and group work in person.

Format shift

Online workload is moderate, while .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students describe her as passionate, helpful, and engaging, though one in-person review reports severe disorganization.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is consistently strong, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention homework, group work, participation, lectures, a museum trip, and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions tests and lectures, while , and attendance.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise her passion and learning value but report , and some disorganization.

Main concern

Workload and organization can be frustrating.

What students said

“There is A LOT of homework.”
ART110
“ , and doesnt believe in providing an assignment calendar to her students.”
ART216

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students describe an engaging, fair, and worthwhile class with moderate workload.

Main concern

The online sample is small and older.

What students said

“Overall this was a very easy class, this was right after COVID-19 so it was via online.”
ART110C
“Workload was moderate and and professor seemed passionate about the subject.”
ART110C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clear proof of proctoring, open-book rules, or strict exam format.

Fair TestsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Online

Online reviews only clearly support fair tests and do not prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Fair Tests
“Workload was moderate and and professor seemed passionate about the subject.”
ART110C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She will teach you everything, and she has a blunt attitude so don't be offended as she talks in an unbiased way.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“she is a very professional person who loves her work and makes the class interesting”

📚 Workload Reality

44/100

“There is A LOT of homework.”

👍 Recommendation Level

70/100

“I took this class in the summer and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures were engaging
  • She is very honest, and passionate about art.
  • Professor Gutierrez is clearly passionate and very knowledgeable about the subject.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • Workload was moderate
  • There is A LOT of homework.
  • But it isn't too hard so just do the work without being lazy.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • students are left trying to figure out what is due on short notice.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews give useful detail, but the sample is small and several reviews are from 2019 or 2020.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART1102 reviews
ART110C2 reviews
ART2162 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values