AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Shinah Ji Kim

N292 · NS193 · N192 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a and detailed feedback.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClinical FeedbackCaring InstructorClear ExpectationsTough but FairLimited Hands-On Practice
  • Students mostly describe Kim as caring, approachable, and .
  • and somewhat demanding, especially around competencies and care plans.
  • One major concern is limited hands-on clinical practice in at least one student's experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades appear achievable with and feedback, but clinical standards are demanding rather than easy.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The clinical material is intense and competency-based, but Kim's guidance makes expectations clearer.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Clinical participation is treated as important, and one review says skipping class means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Students recommend her because , and gives useful feedback despite firm standards.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Students describe clear criteria and fairness, but and fastidious standards.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is not described as excessive, but clinical competencies and care plans require steady preparation.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and helpful with feedback.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews focus more on clinical performance, competencies, care plans, and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person clinical reviews are strongly positive overall, with praise for , and care.

Main concern

Some students may want more independent hands-on clinical practice.

What students said

“She is very clear about her expectations from students in clinicals and with care plans.”
N292
“her comments and feed back helped out a lot.”
N192
“she doesn't let you do much in clinical.”
N292

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews discuss competencies and care plans, but they do not clearly prove a .

CompetenciesCare PlansNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention competencies and care plans, but do not clearly .

CompetenciesCare PlansNo Clear Exam Policy
“I passed my competency care plan from first attempt with her”
N292
“When you do competencies with her she basically puts your hands in hers”
N292

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mrs. Kim was an amazing clinical instructor she loves to teach and goes above and beyond to prepare you for semesters ahead.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and standards; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She is very clear about her expectations from students in clinicals and with care plans.”

💬

88/100

“her comments and feed back helped out a lot.”

⚖️ Clinical Limits

50/100

“I wasn't able to practice nursing to the full extent”

Theme 1

👩‍⚕️ About Clinical Teaching

  • She is very clear about her expectations from students in clinicals and with care plans.
  • Mrs. Kim was an amazing clinical instructor she loves to teach and goes above and beyond to prepare you for semesters ahead.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • and very sweet to her students.
  • She actually cares about her students.
  • and fair.

Theme 3

📋 About Standards and Feedback

  • her comments and feed back helped out a lot.
  • At first I was afraid of her, inasmuch as she is a and pretty fastidious.
  • Shes mostly about verbalizing your knowledge.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only 4 reviews, but they are detailed and mostly consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

N2922 reviews
N1921 review
NS1931 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values