AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Patricia Spitler

HS147 · 277C · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself from scattered materials and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CourseReads SlidesPoor CommunicationConfusing TestsHeavy Mandatory Lectures
  • Most students describe the course as , and poorly taught.
  • Online and , quizzes, and lectures that do not align.
  • One older online hybrid review is positive, but it is outweighed by several recent severe complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A looks difficult because , and there is little grade buffering.

Both online and in-person reviews report mismatched assessments, while the only positive online review is older and from a different course.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The content is already difficult and becomes harder because , and .

Online reviews stress confusing materials, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

and being made to stay for the whole class.

Both online hybrid and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students overwhelmingly warn against taking her because of disorganization, poor teaching, and .

Recent online and in-person HS147 reviews are strongly negative, despite one older positive online hybrid review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Grades depend heavily on frequent quizzes or and poorly aligned preparation materials.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly tests with , and match instruction.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students describe too much information, , and unclear study demands.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize weekly tests and self-teaching, while and timed quizzes.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews say she , and gives inconsistent course information.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews report weak teaching, with one older online hybrid review as the only positive exception.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Recent , and exams as the main grade pressure, with .

Format shift

Online HS147 reviews stress weekly tests, while in-person HS147 reviews mention quizzes and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also very negative, emphasizing long , and weak explanations.

Main concern

Long mandatory lectures and .

What students said

“ .”
HS147
“ .”
HS147
“She spends 2 hours reading through the powerpoint and not explaining much.”
HS147

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly very negative, , and syllabus inconsistency.

Main concern

because , and tests are described as poorly aligned.

What students said

“The textbook, slides and study guide she gives us DO NOT match up”
HS147
“no teaching. Tells you to use google for info.”
HS147
“ .”
HS147

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments appear strict and risky because tests are frequent, short, and poorly aligned, but reviews do not clearly .

Weekly TestsShort Timed QuizzesTests Do Not Match MaterialsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and timed quizzes that do not match lectures or materials, but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Short Timed QuizzesExams Do Not Match MaterialsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ .”
HS147
“she provides very little time for quiz”
HS147
“Powerpoints ”
HS147

Online

Online and mismatched study materials, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Weekly TestsOnline QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ and no HW to help buffer our grades.”
HS147
“ .”
277C
“Gives a study guide but half the info isn't in the .”
HS147

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, organization, and assessment risk; credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

18/100

“ .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She spends 2 hours reading through the powerpoint and not explaining much.”

🧪 Assessment Risk

22/100

“ and no HW to help buffer our grades.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All she does is read word for .
  • no teaching. Tells you to use google for info.
  • She spends 2 hours reading through the powerpoint and not explaining much.

Theme 2

📉 About Organization

  • The textbook, slides and study guide she gives us DO NOT match up
  • she admits the syllabus is not hers and does not stick to it.
  • She doesn't even stick to her own syllabus!

Theme 3

📝 About Tests and Workload

  • and no HW to help buffer our grades.
  • .
  • Powerpoints do not match weekly quizzes w/ 2 chapters each.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 7 reviews include detailed and consistent recent complaints across formats, but one older positive review conflicts with the trend.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

HS1476 reviews
277C1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 2