AI Rate Professor

Languages

Edgar Herrera

SPAN102 · SPAN101 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you will attend, participate, and keep up with homework, but if you need a low-pressure Spanish class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny and engagingParticipation heavyLots of homeworkStrict deadlinesHelpful if asked
  • Students often praise his humor, energy, and ability to make Spanish enjoyable.
  • Grades depend , and test preparation.
  • Workload and Spanish experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic if , and study, but the workload and strict rules prevent it from being effortless.

Online evidence is mixed, while in-person reviews .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The Spanish content is manageable for prepared beginners, but grammar, vocab, and .

Online comments are too mixed for a firm content judgment, while as easy when students keep up.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly described as important, with one review saying .

; online reviews do not clearly discuss attendance flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and helpful, but several warn against him because of , and strict expectations.

Online reviews conflict sharply, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

He drops some lowest scores and gives clear paths to success, but and no late work.

Format shift

, while online comments add little beyond one positive and one negative experience.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and classwork are repeatedly described as long or frequent.

Format shift

Both formats mention homework, but heavy workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students describe him as , and helpful when asked, despite some complaints about grammar coverage.

Format shift

In-person reviews strongly support good teaching, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear to combine homework, participation, quizzes, tests, writing, listening, and comprehension work.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe the assessment mix in detail, while and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews mostly describe him as funny, helpful, and engaging, but , and deadlines.

Main concern

The main and strict participation or .

What students said

“This class was really easy. .”
SPAN101
“He will not except any late work.”
SPAN101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and one review saying the class is easy with participation and homework.

Main concern

and the .

What students said

“Horrible professor. .”
SPAN101
“He does use McGraw and proctorio for tests.”
SPAN101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies by format, with online Proctorio mentioned once and as listening, multiple choice, writing, grammar, and vocabulary focused.

Proctorio for Online TestsListening ComprehensionMultiple ChoiceWriting PortionQuizzes Before Tests

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe tests with listening, comprehension, multiple choice, writing, grammar, and vocabulary, but .

Listening ComprehensionMultiple ChoiceWriting PortionGrammar and Vocab Study
“ , and a writing portion.”
SPAN101
“For the test. Study all the grammar!!! And vocab.”
SPAN102

Online

One online review explicitly says tests use Proctorio, but reviews do not clearly .

Proctorio for Tests
“He does use McGraw and proctorio for tests.”
SPAN101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class was really easy. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and participation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Professor Herrera is really funny and lectures well.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“Connect hw hard and long -.-”

⚖️

58/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes class fun.
  • He explained things very well.
  • He is a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This class was really easy. .
  • Will mark you off on tests for and not beneficial whatsoever.
  • .

Theme 3

🗣️ About Participation and Attendance

  • Be prepared for participating its apart of your grade.
  • You have to answer a couple of questions out loud, he randomly selects on you.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews across many years give detailed and mostly consistent evidence about teaching style, workload, participation, and grading.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

SPAN10110 reviews
SPAN1023 reviews
101981 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1