AI Rate Professor

Media Arts & Design

Katalin Angelov

MAD100 · MAD201 · MAD100C · MAD187 · MAD200 · MAD107C · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
90.91%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Take her if you want a projects, and a high chance of success.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorClear explanationsStrong feedbackBeginner friendlyLight project workload
  • Most students describe her as , and highly supportive.
  • Grades appear very attainable, especially when students complete projects and ask for help.
  • and organization for faster learners.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A looks very realistic because , and most reported grades are A-level, though students still need to complete creative work.

Online and in-person reviews giving stronger proof of low homework and in-class work time.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The courses are generally beginner-friendly and clearly explained, but creative .

Online reviews praise clear support, while slow for faster learners.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

, but in-class time appears useful for and getting help.

Online , while in-person reviews suggest class time is valuable rather than punitive.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and passionate about teaching.

Both formats are highly positive, with the only serious negative coming from one in-person student who disliked the pacing and organization.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

because most reported grades are A-level and students say paying attention and completing work is enough.

Format shift

Both formats show strong grade outcomes, with expectations.

Workload

Light

82/100

Workload is light to moderate because students report , and substantial in-class work time.

Format shift

, while online reviews mention a difficult working process but not overwhelming volume.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Teaching quality is excellent overall because , and creative guidance despite one complaint about organization.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize accessibility and one-on-one support, while , and kindness.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment appears centered on creative projects and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats discuss assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly , and creative freedom, with one sharp complaint about boredom and organization.

Main concern

Advanced students may feel the pace is too slow and the lectures too unfocused.

What students said

“ so much time to work on them in class.”
MAD201
“Everything is explained clearly, so as long as you pay attention, you're golden.”
MAD187
“You will be bored out of your mind.”
MAD100C

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are , and individual support.

Main concern

One online student found the working process difficult despite still recommending the class.

What students said

“ !”
MAD100C
“Even though it was online, she managed to focus on every student and give them a one on one meeting.”
MAD100
“Very fun class. Difficult working process but .”
MAD100C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, final, open-book, or closed-book exam policies.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“She clearly cares for her students and and accessible.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“ as my professor.”

📈 Grade Value

88/100

“Everything is explained clearly, so as long as you pay attention, you're golden.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and descriptively, you wont miss a single work.
  • She really cares about you and your ideas and .
  • ?

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • so much time to work on them in class.
  • Very fun class. Difficult working process but .
  • Everything is explained clearly, so as long as you pay attention, you're golden.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • ! she's so understanding & kind.
  • The .
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 11 reviews span several years, include both formats, and show a consistent positive pattern with .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MAD2004 reviews
MAD100C3 reviews
MAD1001 review
MAD107C1 review
MAD1871 review
Show 1 more courses
MAD2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 7

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values