AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Scott Robertson

ESL184 · ESL53 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a , and some extra-credit upside.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyFunny teacherHelpful and kindExtra creditClear grammar practiceOccasional confusing tests
  • Most students describe him as friendly, funny, helpful, and easy to approach.
  • Several reviews , and tests that .
  • A minority of and weak lecture seriousness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

73/100

An A is realistic with steady practice because , and is mentioned, but some students still struggled with exams.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The grammar course is generally approachable and beginner-friendly, though tests can feel challenging for students who are not prepared.

Only in-person reviews exist, so no format difference can be assessed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend him for being kind, funny, helpful, and .

The because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

because appears repeatedly and several students earned A grades, though poor test performance can hurt.

Format shift

and .

Workload

Light

76/100

Workload appears light because and mostly workbook exercises.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Teaching is good overall because most students praise his kindness, clarity, humor, and help, but .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, so the teaching score is not split by format.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears balanced because , and tests rather than one dominant method.

Format shift

and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

All evidence is from in-person reviews, which are mostly positive about his humor, kindness, and helpfulness, with .

Main concern

and thought his teaching was not serious enough.

What students said

“He is friendly and helpful.”
ESL184
“ so they are easy.”
ESL53
“Dont help you study for the test and .”
ESL53

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest standard tests, sometimes similar to homework but sometimes challenging or confusing, with .

Tests can resemble homeworkSome tests challengingExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but also describe some tests as challenging and confusing.

Tests can resemble homeworkSome tests challenging
“ so they are easy.”
ESL53
“ .”
ESL53

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is friendly and helpful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and personality. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He teachs and answer student's questions clearly.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ .”

⚖️

78/100

“ from our workbooks.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • this professor really good teacher
  • He is friendly and helpful.
  • Take another professor. not him. thinks he's funny but bad teacher.

Theme 2

📈

  • from our workbooks.
  • so they are easy.
  • Dont help you study for the test and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • the
  • Awesome professor ever!!!! and fun.
  • and kind :3

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are 10 reviews over a long period, but several are old and some are very brief.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ESL1844 reviews
ESL534 reviews
0532 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1