AI Rate Professor

Art

Robert Huerta

ART20A · ART100 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if and uneven organization without much structure.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy workloadInconsistent experienceDelayed gradingPractical assignmentsLow organization risk
  • The online review is positive but still warns about a lot of work.
  • The in-person review is highly negative, , and sudden assignment overload.
  • Evidence is thin because there are only two reviews and the two formats strongly conflict.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Passing may be attainable if work is submitted, but the workload and and uncertain.

Online evidence says he gives credit for work, while and delayed grading hurt the experience.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content sounds practical rather than conceptually brutal, but the .

Online evidence frames the work as manageable with discipline, while as disorganized and excessive.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

The online review says going in person was available but not necessary, and the .

Only the online review provides .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends heavily on format and tolerance for workload because one student enjoyed the class while another strongly warned against it.

Online evidence is positive and , so the recommendation is format-sensitive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but and limited evidence keep leniency uncertain.

Format shift

Online evidence suggests fair credit for work, while .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Workload is heavy because both reviews mention a lot of assignments, including one report of 10 assignments due suddenly.

Format shift

Online describes the workload as manageable with no procrastination, while as overwhelming and disorganized.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching experience is poor overall because the positive online review and organization.

Format shift

Online evidence is supportive and practical, while and structure.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

Assessment appears assignment-heavy because both reviews focus on work volume and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review is very negative, describing , and .

Main concern

Workload and organization may feel overwhelming and unfair.

What students said

“Puts little to no effort into the class yet gives us so much work to do.”
ART100
“Still hasnt graded anything from the first week of class then gives us 10 different assignments due by tonight.”
ART100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is positive, saying the workload is high but practical and manageable if students do not procrastinate.

Main concern

A lot of work can become a problem for procrastinators.

What students said

“even tho he assigns a lot of work it's really practical if u don't procrastinate.”
art20a
“he gives credit for your work so definitely won't fail.”
art20a

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, final, open-book, or closed-book exam policies.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Puts little to no effort into the class yet gives us so much work to do.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the conflict between practical online work and a . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Puts little to no effort into the class yet gives us so much work to do.”

📦 Workload Pressure

22/100

“then gives us 10 different assignments due by tonight.”

⚖️ Grade Uncertainty

55/100

“he gives credit for your work so definitely won't fail.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • he assigns a lot of work it's really practical if u don't procrastinate.
  • then gives us 10 different assignments due by tonight.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I really enjoyed his class, definitely taking it again.
  • Puts little to no effort into the class yet gives us so much work to do.

Theme 3

⚖️

  • he gives credit for your work so definitely won't fail.
  • Still hasnt graded anything from the first week of class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only two reviews, one per format, and they sharply conflict.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART1001 review
art20a1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values