AI Rate Professor

Art

Dennis Wright

MAD100 · MAD132C · MAD100C · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you are independent, comfortable with , and willing to manage project expectations on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor CommunicationTough GraderLong LecturesUnclear GradesProject Heavy
  • Student experience is sharply polarized, with a few strong positives but many severe complaints.
  • The biggest repeated issue is unclear grading, late or , and difficulty knowing where you stand.
  • The course is project and paperwork heavy, with long lectures and inconsistent support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A appears possible for engaged students, but , and and risky.

Online includes one A- but also a ; but many complaints about difficulty and feedback.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course is hard mainly because of , and limited feedback.

Both formats show challenge, but online complaints focus on grade opacity while and workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Reviews , but participation, lecture attention, and engagement appear important.

Online evidence mentions participation but , while and engaging matter.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Most negative reviews advise against him because of , and limited help.

Online is split between one excellent review and two strong avoid reviews, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly report tough grading, missing grade visibility, and .

Format shift

Online grading concerns are severe because grades may not appear in Canvas, while and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students describe long lectures, paperwork, projects, and a tough long journey.

Format shift

Online work centers on homework and projects, while and lots of paperwork.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Some students praise his program instruction, but many describe him as , and unhelpful.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is polarized, while and feedback.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

, and class engagement, with online evidence explicitly saying there are no exams.

Format shift

and projects with no exams, while and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews mostly describe long , and weak feedback, with a few students praising his program instruction.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“His lectures could be long”
MAD100
“ and paperwork gets messy.”
MAD100
“communication was spotty.”
MAD100

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly polarized, ranging from caring and , and opaque about grades.

Main concern

Students may not know their project grades until it is too late.

What students said

“NO EXAMS! and ”
MAD100C
“Hes very rude and unhelpful. !!”
MAD100C
“You never know how you're doing in his class because he .”
MAD132C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews only clearly support an assignment and proctoring.

No ExamsHomework and ProjectsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention paperwork and projects but do not clearly .

PaperworkProjects
“Lecture and ”
MAD100
“The and dry”
MAD100

Online

Online evidence explicitly says there are no exams and the course uses homework and projects; reviews do not clearly .

No ExamsHomework and Projects
“NO EXAMS! and ”
MAD100C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You never know how you're doing in his class because he .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“Hes very rude and unhelpful. !!”

⚖️

25/100

“I ended up with a D and never even knew any of .”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“Lecture and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he always asks questions and repeats.
  • His lectures could be long
  • He's great at teaching the programs and walking students through the practices

Theme 2

⚠️ About Communication and Feedback

  • and paperwork gets messy.
  • communication was spotty.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Workload

  • You never know how you're doing in his class because he .
  • NO EXAMS! and
  • Asking for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews over many years show repeated, , and feedback despite some positive outliers.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MAD1006 reviews
MAD100C3 reviews
MAD132C1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4