AI Rate Professor

Art

Molly Schulps

ART150C · ART001 · 155C · CRMCS101 · ART153 · CERAM3 · ART152 · ART151 · ART150 · ARTIDK · CERAMICS · CERAM151 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a hands-on ceramics class and , and some self-direction.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate Ceramics TeacherEffort-Based GradingAttendance MattersTime-Intensive ProjectsMixed Helpfulness
  • Students often praise her passion, humor, demos, and .
  • The , and consistent attendance.
  • A notable minority report moodiness, harsh criticism, favoritism, or limited individual help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Good grades are realistic when students show up and put in effort, but this is not a free A for everyone.

The single online review says attendance and effort are enough, while , and effort-based grading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The course is approachable for committed students but ceramics skills, projects, and pacing can be challenging.

Online evidence describes a fun class with effort required, while to time-intensive and stressful.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

, and multiple students warn that missing or arriving late can hurt success.

Online and in-person evidence both emphasize attendance, with and missing class.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and helpful instruction, but some warn about moodiness, harsh criticism, or limited help.

Online evidence is positive but thin, while minority of warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Grades often reward effort, completion, improvement, and participation rather than perfect artistic skill.

Format shift

Online evidence supports effort-based success, while and not-an-easy-A warnings.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and work outside class.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions attendance and effort, while and supply demands.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Her passion and demos are praised, but student support and personality are inconsistent across reviews.

Format shift

but limited, while but mostly favorable over many years.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades appear , and effort, with very few tests mentioned.

Format shift

and participation assessment rather than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a passionate, funny, knowledgeable teacher whose ceramics classes reward effort but require time and resilience.

Main concern

, and occasional harsh or uneven support can be stressful.

What students said

“You really have to put work into what you're making.”
ART151
“You need to INVEST A LOT OF TIME to this class.”
ART150
“This is not and easy A.”
CERAM151

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review says she is gentle and caring, but attendance and effort matter most.

Main concern

Attendance and effort are required to stay on track.

What students said

“What she cares about the and effort”
ART150C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest exams are minimal, but , and proctoring are not clearly proven.

Tests Not ManyOne QuizOne FinalExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but do not clearly prove exam format or rules.

Tests Not ManyOne QuizOne Final
“one quiz. .”
ART151
“Tests? Not many”
ART151

Online

The single online review does not .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you put in the effort, you'll get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, effort, and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Molly shows great demos of what needs to be done, but beyond that there is not much help.”

📈 Effort-Based Grades

68/100

“The effort you put in reflects your grade”

⏱️ Workload Reality

35/100

“You need to INVEST A LOT OF TIME to this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and very understanding with her students.
  • Molly tries her hardest to teach her students.
  • She makes you feel unwelcome and criticizes all of your work really harshly in front of everyone.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy grading you only have 5 projects and an and thats its easy A.
  • This is not and easy A.
  • As long as you put in the effort, you'll get an A.

Theme 3

🧱 About Time & Supplies

  • Beware if you take art 151 you must have extra time to come in and finish your work
  • and you will have to work during your own time.
  • Need to buy stuff and it adds up.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-six reviews across many years provide detailed and consistent patterns, though only one review is online.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 512
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART15112 reviews
ART1508 reviews
ART150C3 reviews
ART1522 reviews
ART1532 reviews
Show 8 more courses
CERAM1512 reviews
1511 review
155C1 review
ART0011 review
ARTIDK1 review
CERAM31 review
CERAMICS1 review
CRMCS1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values