AI Rate Professor

English

Tiffany Monroe

ENGL103 · ENGL100 · CHEM1151 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
59/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you value a kind professor and can handle uneven organization and essay-based work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKind but inconsistentEssay heavyHelpful when availableUnclear organizationMixed grading
  • Students often describe Monroe as nice, understanding, and approachable.
  • Teaching organization is inconsistent, with , and delayed feedback.
  • Grades can be manageable in English courses, but some students still report hard work, harsh grading, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Some English sections sound easy or flexible, but other comments say students must work hard and .

The lone online review gives no easy-A support, while and hard-work warnings.

Is the course easy?

Standard

57/100

English work is mostly essays and projects, but unclear directions and .

Online evidence describes confusion and little teaching, while demanding chemistry.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but there is also evidence of early dismissals, cancellations, and hybrid flexibility.

Online evidence centers on canceled hybrid meetings, while courses.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

and understanding, but many hesitate because teaching organization and .

The online review is not recommended, while and clear frustration.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grading looks inconsistent, with some late-work flexibility and curves but also reports of and .

Format shift

Online , while in-person reviews provide mixed evidence from English and chemistry.

Workload

Moderate

54/100

English courses involve essays and projects, and , and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

The online review focuses on essay difficulty, while , and tests.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is often described as kind and approachable, but organization, clarity, cancellations, and .

Format shift

Online evidence is strongly negative on organization, while English reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Assessments , and tests, with no single method dominating all courses.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews mention essays, quizzes, projects, homework, midterms, and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with strong praise for kindness and help in English classes but , and delayed feedback.

Main concern

, and course demands vary sharply by class.

What students said

“professor monroe has been the most understanding and ”
ENGL103
“ .”
ENGL100
“Her study guides/previous tests are .”
CHEM1151

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online evidence is negative, focused on cancellations, weak organization, and limited teaching support in a hybrid ENGL100 course.

Main concern

Students .

What students said

“ .”
ENGL100
“She did not teach much and it was difficult to write the .”
ENGL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies by course, with one English class reporting no exams while .

No Exams In One English ClassFinal ProjectOnline QuizzesMidterm MentionedTest-Heavy Chemistry

Assessment risk

Varies

67/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence supports no exams in one English class and difficult test-heavy assessment in chemistry, with .

No Exams In One English ClassFinal ProjectOnline QuizzesTest-Heavy Chemistry
“ !”
ENG103
“Her study guides/previous tests are .”
CHEM1151

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, webcam use, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a ... just not a good professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She is a cheerful and good as a person but not teaching wise.”

📈 Grade Effort

66/100

“ and willing to help her students, but you need to work hard to get an A.”

👍 Recommendation Level

48/100

“professor monroe has been the most understanding and helpful english professor i have ever ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • .
  • Very understanding and .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • Easy A!
  • like any english class there are a lot of essays
  • She does not give a lot of extra credits, and she grades kinda harsh.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Always comes to class with a smile!
  • She is super considerate though and very nice.
  • and willing to help her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across many years give consistent themes about kindness, organization issues, and , though course mix reduces precision.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL1033 reviews
CHEM11512 reviews
ENG1032 reviews
ENGL1002 reviews
ENG1001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values