AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Daniel Ulloa

MATH120 · MATHA030 · MATH16 · MATH20 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
89.47%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if and are willing to keep up with homework.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear LecturesStudy Guides Match ExamsCaringEasy A With EffortLots of Homework
  • and organized structure.
  • Practice exams and study guides closely match actual exams, making grades very predictable.
  • , but most students say the reward is high.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A is very realistic if , and study practice exams that closely match tests.

The Easy A ; the lone online review warns the course is hard for online learners.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Students , and manageable even for people who struggle with the subject.

In-person reviews strongly support easy-to-follow content, while the single .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but students repeatedly say showing up and taking notes are important.

; online evidence does not clearly establish an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend him because he , and cares about student success.

, while the only online review is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Practice exams, cheat sheets, dropped , and final exemptions make grading very student-friendly.

Format shift

; the online review instead calls him tough.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

as a lot and time-consuming, but it is manageable and directly useful for grades.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of homework, but in-person students usually frame it as worthwhile.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students , and ideal for people who struggle with math.

Format shift

, while the single online review says YouTube lectures are harder to follow.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and a final, with exams important but highly predictable.

Format shift

; online evidence only generally mentions workload and grading difficulty.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, predictable exams, and strong grade support.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ .”
MATH120
“As long as you do not slack off and put in effort from beginning to end you're almost guaranteed an A in the class.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is negative and says the class is a poor fit for students needing quick support or strong online teaching.

Main concern

Delayed communication and YouTube-based lectures may hurt online learners.

What students said

“ if you work full-time, taking other classes or if you are not an online learner.”
MATH120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are student-friendly because practice exams closely match tests and some reviews mention .

Practice Exams Match TestsCheat Sheet AllowedFinal Exemption PossibleDropped Lowest TestCalculator Allowed

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or practice exams, with some cheat sheet, calculator, dropped-score, and final-exemption policies.

Practice Exams Match TestsCheat Sheet AllowedFinal Exemption PossibleDropped Lowest TestCalculator Allowed
“the study guides are essentially carbon copies of the test.”
MATH120
“He also lets you use a " ”
MATH120

Online

The online review does not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you do not slack off and put in effort from beginning to end you're almost guaranteed an A in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“The .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“ ”

⚖️

88/100

“If you get 3 As and at least 1 B throughout the semester you !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and only gives Pearson homework due the day of the exams.
  • !
  • He tells you exactly what you need to know and does an excellent job at explaining it.

Theme 2

📈

  • .
  • the study guides are essentially carbon copies of the test.
  • as well.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • .
  • if you want a good grade, plus it helps you with the exams.
  • 4 exams. 1 cumulative final. And lots of HW.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews show strong consistency across years, with one online outlier against many detailed positive in-person reports.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH12016 reviews
MATH161 review
MATH201 review
MATHA0301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 6 · A 4

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values