AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mutsuno Ryan

MATH124 · MATH40 · MATH160 · MATH20 · MATH15 · CALC2 · MATH040 · MATH41 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her if you want a helpful math instructor and , and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpfulPatientAccent ConcernOpen-Note SupportQuizzes Often
  • Most students , and good for students who struggle with math.
  • Some students find her accent or pacing difficult, creating mixed teaching clarity.
  • Quizzes, homework, and attendance matter, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is realistic for students who do the , and attend quizzes, with several reviews calling the class easy.

, while the single online review is positive but not grade-specific.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Many students say and helps beginners, though calculus and some later material can be challenging.

Online evidence says fast but clear, while and mixed because of accent and pacing concerns.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

because several reviews mention mandatory attendance, pop quizzes, or quizzes every class.

; the online review does not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend her because , and willing to support students who struggle with math.

The only online review is strongly positive, and concerns.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Study guides, open-book , and helpful review support make grading feel forgiving.

Format shift

Lenient policy evidence comes mainly from in-person reviews, with .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

and quizzes are frequent, but most students describe the workload as manageable.

Format shift

and frequent quizzes; the online review does not emphasize workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students generally find her caring and helpful, though accent and pacing reduce clarity for some.

Format shift

Online feedback is positive but limited, while and repeated accent concerns.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and finals rather than relying on one single method.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment details; online reviews .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive, but , and homework demands.

Main concern

Some students struggle to understand her accent or .

What students said

“She has a really strong accent, but her teaching is awesome.”
MATH41
“ . There were 5 exams and .”
MATH124

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The only online review is positive and says the lectures are fast but well explained with accommodating support.

Main concern

Lecture pace can be fast.

What students said

“He and is more than willing to slow down and answer questions.”
MATH040

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam and quiz policies vary, with several student-friendly note or study-guide supports but one review saying no cheat sheets.

Open-Book QuizzesStudy Guides Similar To TestsIndex Card AllowedNo Cheat Sheets In One ReviewPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Varies

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention open-book quizzes, study guides similar to , and one no-cheat-sheet policy.

Open-Book QuizzesStudy Guides Similar To TestsIndex Card AllowedNo Cheat Sheets In One ReviewPop Quizzes
“IN CLASS QUIZZES ARE OPEN BOOK AND SHORT.”
MATH20
“You're allowed to use index card with .”
MATH41

Online

The online review does not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you struggle with .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“I really suck at math, but she explained everything perfectly and now it makes more sense to me.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“If you aren't as a teacher!”

⚖️

78/100

“She gives you a study guide for each test.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Caring and helpful.
  • She repeats everything and writes everything on the board.
  • Horrible, extremely

Theme 2

📈

  • IN CLASS QUIZZES ARE OPEN BOOK AND SHORT.
  • You're allowed to use index card with .
  • There were 5 exams and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She never says no if you need her help inside or outside of class.
  • Both are accommodating and understanding.
  • She is always willing to help too!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews over many years provide enough detail, though older reviews and mixed course contexts slightly reduce certainty.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH404 reviews
MATH414 reviews
MATH0402 reviews
MATH152 reviews
CALC21 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH1241 review
MATH1601 review
MATH201 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values